Re: Dockerfile and Docker Hub Management

2017-09-26 Thread Aldrin Piri
It seems like the separate release process is the one of preference. I have created a JIRA issue (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-4425) to capture some of the sentiment from this thread and to subsequently track the efforts once we start executing upon them. Feel free to add any

Re: Dockerfile and Docker Hub Management

2017-09-21 Thread Adam Taft
Aldrin, +1 to separate repository (bullet #2). The basic premise that Docker releases should happen separate from the main distribution is spot on. I think a separate repository would help keep this separation. I tend to believe that the future of NiFi distributions will be via

Re: Dockerfile and Docker Hub Management

2017-09-21 Thread Kevin Doran
Thanks, Aldrin. I'm a +1 for a separate NiFi Docker project and release process, allowing improvements to the containerization of NiFi artifacts to be made independently from the artifacts (and their source files). I have observed many community members maintaining their own NiFi Dockerfiles