Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

the release is now out - i've updated the migration guide to highlight this known PutMongo issue. Hopefully I captured the language properly there but if not please feel free to change. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NIFI/Migration+Guidance On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Joe Witt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:42 PM, Joey Frazee wrote: > Like slowpoke... > > +1 (non-binding) > > - Verified checksums and signature > - Successfully built and ran unit tests and flows on OSX (Oracle 1.8.0_152), > Amazon Linux (Oracle 1.8.0_161) > > FWIW,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

Like slowpoke... +1 (non-binding) - Verified checksums and signature - Successfully built and ran unit tests and flows on OSX (Oracle 1.8.0_152), Amazon Linux (Oracle 1.8.0_161) FWIW, something isn’t working with the RPM build the way it was. Don’t have anything specific to report though and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (non-binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 Comments: - sig and hashes look good - ran a simple flow, saving/loading from Registry - full build w/tests passed, but it took two attempts. First time failed @ nifi-ambari-reporting-task due to a test failure: [ERROR] Errors: [ERROR]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (non-binding) - Ran full clean install on OS X (10.13.3) - Tested a farily large flow with OpenID connect and another with LDAP - Tested fine grained restricted component policies. - Reviewed documentation > On Apr 6, 2018, at 1:05 PM, Andrew Lim wrote: > > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (non-binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (10.11.6) -Tested integration with Secure NiFi Registry (1.5.0) -Tested fine grained restricted component policies. -Ran basic flows successfully -Reviewed documentation Drew > On Apr 3, 2018, at 7:49 PM, Joe Witt wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

That should do it. It's just a problem in customValidate that didn't check the MODE parameter. So I don't think it'll matter if you set either that or the update query key since those should only be used during updates. Thanks, Mike On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 10:28 AM, Matt Burgess

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

Mike, Is there a workaround for this? Like setting the query key(s) for insert even if they are ignored? Or will that cause other issues? Thanks, Matt On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:56 AM, Mike Thomsen wrote: > Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this morning I found a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this morning I found a bug in PutMongo that breaks insert mode. PR here: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2609 On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:14 AM, Koji Kawamura wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran through the release helper steps. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Ran through the release helper steps. Confirmed example flows including Atlas integration work with a secure NiFi cluster. Thanks for the release efforts! On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 1:01 PM, James Wing wrote: > +1 (binding) - Ran through the release helper checksums

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) - Ran through the release helper checksums and build steps (Amazon Linux). Upgraded a working NiFi out of unbounded optimism for RC3, and it's looking good. Thanks again for the release efforts! On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) comments: verified signature and hashes Built on ubuntu 14.04 x86_64 Reviewed NOTICE and LICENSE files, did not find issues Ran a few simple flows without issues. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > +1, binding > > > comments: > > * signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1, binding comments: * signature and hashes check out * build/tests verified on Debian 9, OS X 10.13, & CentOS 7 * simple flows and templates looked good On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:13 PM, Scott Aslan wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 > > - Ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 - Ran through release helper - Verified with test flow On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Bryan Bende wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 > > - Ran through release helper > - Ran sample flows and tested

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 - Ran through release helper - Ran sample flows and tested granular restricted components with versioned flows On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:40 PM, Matt Gilman wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 > > - Ran

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 - Ran through release help - Verified issued discovered by Andrew Lim in previous RC Thanks for RMing Joe! Matt On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Pierre Villard wrote: > +1 binding > > - went through the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 binding - went through the release helper guide - full build on Mac OS X - confirmed that previous issues reported with RC1 and RC2 are fixed - tested secured/unsecured standalone/cluster deployments Minor remark for the RM documentation and the release helper guide. We're currently saying to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 binding -- verified sigs and hashes. -- confirmed a parallel build with tests -- started secure cluster and interfaced with Apache NiFi MiNiFi C++ On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 6:33 AM, Takanobu Asanuma wrote: > Thanks for all your efforts, Joe. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

+1 (binding), ran through the verification helper on Mac OS X 10.13.4 with full build, tried various flows and validated a couple fixes. Thanks for handling the release Joe! On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:49 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC3)

Thanks for all your efforts, Joe. +1(non-binding). - Verified all hashes - Succeeded "mvn -T 2.0C clean install -Prpm,generateArchives -DskipTests" - Started a secure cluster with three NiFi nodes and three ZK nodes using Docker (Verified the whitelist feature) - Verified some dataflows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

Wellbummer. Good find though Pierre. Lets get that fixed. I'll send the RC2 cancel email. I'll turn around RC3 as soon as it is fixed. thanks On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Pierre Villard wrote: > Guys... I'll have to change my vote to -1. > > While

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

Guys... I'll have to change my vote to -1. While playing with NiFi, I think I found an issue: when updating a variable at pg level that references a restricted component it will fail. It seems the code is the same for secured and unsecured instance and it fails when NiFi is unsecured since the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 - Ran through release help - Verified issued discovered by Andrew Lim in previous RC Thanks for RMing Joe! Matt On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Aldrin Piri wrote: > +1, binding > > > comments: > > * commit looks correct >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1, binding comments: * commit looks correct * signature and hashes check out * build and tests verified on CentOS 7 and OS X 10.12 * ran some simple flows on each and things looked fine On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Sivaprasanna wrote: > Thanks, Scott. That

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

Thanks, Scott. That helped. On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 at 10:09 AM, James Wing wrote: > +1 (binding). Ran through the release helper, worked with a test flow. > Thanks for putting this together. > > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > > Hello, >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding). Ran through the release helper, worked with a test flow. Thanks for putting this together. On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache > NiFi nifi-1.6.0. > > The source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) - Ran through release helper - Setup secure NiFi and verified a test flow Sivaprasanna, I believe the issue you are seeing is due to npm not playing well with your linux distro. If you checkout latest master it contains this PR which should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Followed helper to verify release, built on Ubuntu 16.04 LTS, ran the application successfully. -- Mike On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Mark Payne wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Was able to build successfully and start application. Created some simple > flows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Was able to build successfully and start application. Created some simple flows to verify expected behavior. Verified hashes and signing. Thanks -Mark > On Mar 26, 2018, at 11:34 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

- Confirmed hashes and signature Tried to build in a fresh Ubuntu VM that doesn't have NiFi installed or configured previously. Build fails at nifi-web-ui module. Going by how it works for others, it very well could be a isolated problem on my end. However still wanted to get this posted. Error

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 I ran through the steps in the release helper guide and everything looks good. Thanks for handling RM duties, Joe. --Kevin On 3/26/18, 23:34, "Joe Witt" wrote: Hello, I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source release of Apache NiFi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

Don't have my Linux machine on hand now so tried building on Windows 7 x64 and it fails. [INFO] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.132 s - in org.apache.nifi.wali.TestHashMapSnapshot [INFO] Running org.apache.nifi.wali.TestLengthDelimitedJournal [INFO] Tests run: 6,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 binding Built and tested flow on osx and centos Worked through release helper's guide Validates Sig's and hashes. On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 6:10 AM Pierre Villard wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - went through the release helper guide > - full clean install on OS X > -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) - went through the release helper guide - full clean install on OS X - test unsecured and secured cluster setups and communications with Registry and MiNiFi Java - various flows I have are running as expected - confirmed the fix that blocked the previous RC Thanks Joe for taking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) - Confirmed hashes - Built with include-atlas profile - Confirmed various flows with 3 node secured cluster on Ubuntu - Tested integration with Hadoop environment and NiFi Registry Koji On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Andrew Lim wrote: > +1

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (non-binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (10.11.6) -Tested integration with Secure NiFi Registry (1.5.0) -Tested fine grained restricted component policies. Verified two issues discovered while testing RC1 have been fixed in RC2 [1, 2] -Ran basic flows successfully -Reviewed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) - Verified everything in the release helper - Verified the fix for the fingerprinting issue - Successfully ran some test flows with record processors, HDFS processors, and the keytab CS On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:54 AM, Jeff Zemerick wrote: > +1 non-binding >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 non-binding Built successfully and tests pass. Ran some simple flows -- worked as expected. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Matt Burgess wrote: > +1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 > > Verified checksums, commit, L, etc. Ran full build with unit tests >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0 (RC2)

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 Verified checksums, commit, L, etc. Ran full build with unit tests and tried various flows, all looks well! On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Joe Witt wrote: > Hello, > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the source

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

Is it not possible to review/verify the improvements made to NIFI-4864 issue and then go ahead with the 1.6.0 release process? The new change is relatively minor so if possible, we can verify whether everything is intact and not going to introduce new problems. Maybe, if that’s the case, we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

-1 Ran through the usual release helper stuff, but it seems like the fingerprint issue is going to cause problems, so not sure how useful putting 1.6.0 out there will be if 1.6.1 will have to be turned around immediately. Did you mean to say there's a nifi-1.6.0 -RC tag? It doesn't look like

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

Yeah. Tested and found the bug when using the Schema Registry service. I have made the changes and raised PR #2581 I have tested that both the scenario works as expected: 1. Original reason why the ticket was raised i.e. to reload new resources

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

-1 (binding) I confirm the issue mentioned by Bryan. That's actually what Matt and I experienced when trying the PR about the S2S Metrics Reporting task [1]. I thought it was due to my change but it appears it's not the case. [1] https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2575 2018-03-23 22:53

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

After voting I happened to be using the RC to test something else and came across a bug that I think warrants changing my vote to a -1. I created a simple two node cluster and made a standard convert record flow. When I ran the flow I got a schema not found exception, so I used the debugger which

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (binding) Release this package as nifi-1.6.0 Executed the release helper and verified new granular restrictions with regards to flow versioning. Thanks for RMing Joe! Matt On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:12 PM, Michael Moser wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Ran through release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (binding) Ran through release helper to verify the release and run NiFi on Ubuntu 16.04. It worked as expected with no new comments to add. -- Mike On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Scott Aslan wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Ran through release helper > - Setup secure

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (binding) - Ran through release helper - Setup secure NiFi and verified a test flow On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Bryan Bende wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - Ran through release helper and everything checked out > - Verified some test flows with the restricted components +

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (binding) - Ran through release helper and everything checked out - Verified some test flows with the restricted components + keytab CS On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Mark Payne wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Was able to verify hashes, build with contrib-check, and start

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (binding) Was able to verify hashes, build with contrib-check, and start up application. Performed some basic functionality tests and all worked as expected. Thanks! -Mark > On Mar 23, 2018, at 6:02 AM, Takanobu Asanuma wrote: > > Thanks for all your efforts, Joe.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

Thanks for all your efforts, Joe. I have one question. The version of the generated package is nifi-1.7.0-SNAPSHOT. Is this correct at this stage? If it's ok, +1(non-binding). - Succeeded "mvn -T 2.0C clean install -DskipTests -Prpm" - Started secure cluster mode - Verified sample dataflows

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1 (non-binding) -Ran full clean install on OS X (10.11.6) -Tested integration with Secure NiFi Registry (1.5.0) -Tested fine grained restricted component policies. Found two minor issues: Components are marked with the "restricted" red shield icon, but are not tagged as “restricted"

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NiFi 1.6.0

+1, binding comments: * the listed commit is the new one for 1.7.0 development, its parent 99bc762a181892aa9ac50b0c6c81e8159b052137 matches the source ( https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=nifi.git;a=commit;h=99bc762a181892aa9ac50b0c6c81e8159b052137 ) * signature and hashes look good *