I don't think there are any stability issues with the record API, it
is definitely recommended to use the record approach where it makes
sense.
That comment was probably put there on the first release and never
removed, and now it has been 4-5 releases later.
As a general comment to APIs, the rec
I think that comment is no longer valid. Heck PutHBaseRecord started as
part of a project at my company in early 2017 and we found it perfectly
stable back then.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:46 PM Otto Fowler wrote:
> I’m seeing
>
> https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-commons/nifi-record
I’m seeing
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-commons/nifi-record/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/serialization/RecordReader.java#L34
being quoted as a reason to NOT build Record based processors but instead
stick with the original Processor api.
Yet, on list and on hipchat and in pr’s
