Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Otto Fowler
Joe, Thank you for expounding on your original response. I think that clarifies expectations a great deal. I totally agree, and do those types of reviews myself. As a non-committer who does pr’s and reviews I guess what I was saying is that even if I and someone who entered the issue in jira

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Joe Witt
Otto I wrote: "Anyone can do a review of the code and build and feasibility of a change. It only requires commit privileges to actually merge something." You then wrote "Anyone can review, but you need at least one committer approval / review to get a pr landed." While similar, there is an

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Otto Fowler
Anyone can review, but you need at least one committer approval / review to get a pr landed. On October 8, 2020 at 12:17:17, Joe Witt (joe.w...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello Anyone can do a review of the code and build and feasibility of a change. It only requires commit privileges to actually

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Andy LoPresto
I think the question from Phillip about how to make PR review easier is a great one. For any PR, providing a sample flow which exercises the change is a big time saver already. Demonstrating that unit tests are added/updated, asserting that license considerations have been addressed, and that

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Nissim Shiman
Hello Joe, Phillip and Pierre, I am really happy we are having this discussion. I (and very likely other contributers) was under the impression that only reviews by committers/PMC members (i.e. more senior nifi dev community members) had any real weight, so that is why I have not been reviewing

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Joe Witt
Hello Anyone can do a review of the code and build and feasibility of a change. It only requires commit privileges to actually merge something. Doing the hard work of reviewing/testing the PRs is a *great* way to earn merit. Much of the PRs that tend to hang around are from people contributing

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-08 Thread Phillip Grenier
Pierre, I think this discussion brings up a valid conversation point. At some point a PMC member needs to approve the merge request, so from a contributors level what can we do to make that merge both easier and/or more likely to happen. That and how the community can help filter down the ever

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-07 Thread Pierre Villard
Nissim, Thanks a lot for your contribution but there are 277 pull requests opened at this time. This is a community effort, and if you expect people to review your PRs, you'd have to also try reviewing PRs opened by others in the community. Otherwise this will need to wait for someone with some

Re: request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-07 Thread Nissim Shiman
Second attempt... Hello NiFi team, Could someone respond to this email. Thanks, Nissim Shiman On Monday, October 5, 2020, 11:01:57 AM EDT, Nissim Shiman wrote: Hello NiFi team, Could someone review the pull request for NIFI-7738 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738),

request to review NIFI-7738, Provenance Search Events - add reverse query capability

2020-10-05 Thread Nissim Shiman
Hello NiFi team, Could someone review the pull request for NIFI-7738 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-7738), that was put in 5 days ago? (Provenance Search Events - add feature to allow inverse query) One case this will come in handy is if a particular flowfile has an issue and goes