[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1739) ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak

2014-03-18 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13938922#comment-13938922 ] Alparslan Avcı commented on NUTCH-1739: --- It seems there is no problem for 2.x since

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1739) ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak

2014-03-18 Thread Sebastian Nagel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13938930#comment-13938930 ] Sebastian Nagel commented on NUTCH-1739: Thanks, [~yangshangchuan]. But isn't this

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1739) ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak

2014-03-18 Thread ysc (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13938941#comment-13938941 ] ysc commented on NUTCH-1739: Thanks, [~alparslan.avci] , you are right. Nutch2.1 hasn't

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1739) ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak

2014-03-18 Thread ysc (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13938945#comment-13938945 ] ysc commented on NUTCH-1739: Thanks, [~wastl-nagel] , you are right, i just now saw it. In

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1739) ExecutorService field in ParseUtil.java not be right use and cause memory leak

2014-03-18 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13938962#comment-13938962 ] Alparslan Avcı commented on NUTCH-1739: --- Hi [~yangshangchuan], and thanks for the