[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13085675#comment-13085675
]
David Stuart commented on NUTCH-924:
Yep fine with me. Although it would be quite messy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13085662#comment-13085662
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-924:
-
I am also a proponent of NUTCH-940 for the reaso
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13020747#comment-13020747
]
David Stuart commented on NUTCH-924:
Hi Julien,
Agreed, would it also be better to pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978382#action_12978382
]
David Stuart commented on NUTCH-924:
Yep totally.
I start working on the 2.0 patch
Che
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978377#action_12978377
]
Julien Nioche commented on NUTCH-924:
-
Hi David,
I'd rather commit on both branches at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978359#action_12978359
]
David Stuart commented on NUTCH-924:
Hi Julien,
There is a patch outstanding on this fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932415#action_12932415
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-924:
-
Yes, it needs to be added to trunk too. Please su
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12932411#action_12932411
]
David Stuart commented on NUTCH-924:
Hey Markus,
Is there anything else I need to do on
Yes. As it already adds a second value for an existing NutchDocument field, it
makes sense that it also would allow for multiple staticField definitions with
the same dest parameter.
I'm unsure how to do this with the used HashMap object as its put method
overwrites any previous value.
> So im
So im clear the patch is all good except to extend it allow for specification
of multiple staticField's with the same dest attribute this would (given a
multiple value field) populate said field?
Regards
On 22 Oct 2010, at 14:56, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923861#action_12923861
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-924:
-
Great! The patch almost works as i expected. It:
Just updating the formatting in the patch now and will resubmit
On 22 Oct 2010, at 14:25, Markus Jelsma (JIRA) wrote:
>
>[
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923851#action_12923851
> ]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923851#action_12923851
]
Markus Jelsma commented on NUTCH-924:
-
Yes, i'll look into it next week orso. The pro fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12923845#action_12923845
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on NUTCH-924:
-
The functionality is useful, +1. But the
14 matches
Mail list logo