Hi Chris,
Which week were you referring to? :)
Cheers
On Monday 15 August 2011 17:06:02 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
> Guys, yell at me if I don't have this done by end of week...(i.e., 0.1.1
> Gora release candidate, and VOTE email).
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
> On Aug 15, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Jul
Hi Radim,
If you are building trunk locally then you need to specify all dependencies
in /ivy/ivy.xml
We have a couple of issue with GORA releases before we move on to other
issues and get trunk to recursively build with jenkins.
Does this work for you?
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Radim Ko
> in a nutshell you can't use Ivy or Maven for the Gora dependency,
which is why we are currently stuck with the trunk and can't compile it
without first downloading and compiling GORA locally.
i compiled gora-*-0.2-incubating.jars locally. Where should i put them
to get nutch trunk compiled?
Guys, yell at me if I don't have this done by end of week...(i.e., 0.1.1 Gora
release candidate, and VOTE email).
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 15, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
> I must be missing something here but how do you plan to get the nightly
> builds to compile without declaring Gora
I must be missing something here but how do you plan to get the nightly
builds to compile without declaring Gora as a dependency in Ivy? Will you
put a hard copy of the jars?
The public artefacts for Gora 0.1.incubating are incorrect, as for 0.1.1
they have not been published yet - in a nutshell y
If the stuff is still working fine with Gora 0.1.1 i think it's all okay. But
i'd like to have Chris or Julien pass another vote/comment.
On Thursday 11 August 2011 16:01:08 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
> OK I agree on this.
>
> If we can get a couple of binding votes to downgrade the two depende
Hi
Is there any support to get this moving or is there something I am missing?
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 3:01 PM, lewis john mcgibbney <
lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK I agree on this.
>
> If we can get a couple of binding votes to downgrade the two dependencies
> to 0.1.1-incubating in iv
OK I agree on this.
If we can get a couple of binding votes to downgrade the two dependencies to
0.1.1-incubating in ivy/ivy.xml, then commit to trunk svn for the sake of
getting a successful build then I think we would be back on track with this
long overdue snag.
An ycomments, or objections we
Ah i see. Why not use 0.1.1-incubating then? It's tagged in Gora svn.
On Thursday 11 August 2011 15:53:41 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
> Hi Markus yes I did manage to get it working 'on my own desktop', however
> I'm referring specifically to our nightly builds on Hudson Jenkins.
>
> I have been i
Hi Markus yes I did manage to get it working 'on my own desktop', however
I'm referring specifically to our nightly builds on Hudson Jenkins.
I have been in touch with the builds@ team in an attempt to get Trunk to
build successfully, however the ivy/ivy.xml which exists under trunk svn
specifies
Huh? Didn't you manage to get it running few days ago? I believe Gora trunk is
0.2. There is no tag indeed.
On Thursday 11 August 2011 15:41:46 lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trunk always fails when trying to retrieve the following Gora dendencies
>
> [ivy:resolve]
Hi,
Trunk always fails when trying to retrieve the following Gora dendencies
[ivy:resolve] ::
[ivy:resolve] :: UNRESOLVED DEPENDENCIES ::
[ivy:resolve] ::
[ivy:r
12 matches
Mail list logo
