Build failed in Jenkins: NuttX-Nightly-Build #97

See Changes: -- [...truncated 297.41 KB...] Configuration/Tool: sim/sixlowpan -

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

> How does the RCC (clock tree) compare? RCC looks like in G0 family, which is not registers compatible with older versions. But clock tree is similar to those found in F4/F7. czw., 16 kwi 2020 o 02:34 David Sidrane napisał(a): > How does the RCC (clock tree) compare? > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020,

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

> > This document address migration from F1 to F3 and addresses all major > differences between F1 and F3: AN4228, Application note, Migrating from > STM32F1 Series to STM32F3 Series microcontrollers. Table 6 address every > peripheral. If we are looking at compatibility then yes, most periphera

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

> > Analog: the STM32G474Cxt is heavy on analog features with much more > ADC, DAC, COMP, and OPAMP peripherals and pins than the STM32F3. These > features are obviously new IP as the ADC adds Hardware Oversampling, > IO Voltage Booster, Gain Compensation, Bulb Sampling, Sampling Time > Control Tri

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

How does the RCC (clock tree) compare? On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 5:11 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:08 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > > This document address migration from F1 to F3 and addresses all major > > differences between F1 and F3: AN4228, Application note, Migrating from

Re: [PATCH] drivers/usbdev/usbmsc.c: fix build error with DEBUGASSERT

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:22 AM Juha Niskanen (Haltian) wrote: > Another recent build failure. Has this been converted to a PR? If so, if I may ask, would the person who converts a patch to a PR, please reply to the dev@ email and tell the list that it has been done, with the PR number? Hopefull

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

I don't think we need to expose the RC, it's not the one that's going to be released. The patch, however, could be an option. Some files will need to adapt to that though, not only the version.sh script. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 5:33 PM Brennan Ashton wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 9:29 AM Abd

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:08 PM Gregory Nutt wrote: > This document address migration from F1 to F3 and addresses all major > differences between F1 and F3: AN4228, Application note, Migrating from > STM32F1 Series to STM32F3 Series microcontrollers. Table 6 address every > peripheral. Ok, I'll

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

On 4/15/2020 1:51 PM, Gregory Nutt wrote: This helps clarify the families: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM32 "The STM32 F3-series is the second group of STM32 microcontrollers based on the ARM Cortex-M4F core. The F3 is almost pin-to-pin compatible with the STM32 F1-series. ... "The STM32

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

This document address migration from F1 to F3 and addresses all major differences between F1 and F3:  AN4228, Application note, Migrating from STM32F1 Series to STM32F3 Series microcontrollers. Table 6 address every peripheral.

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

This helps clarify the families: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM32 "The STM32 F3-series is the second group of STM32 microcontrollers based on the ARM Cortex-M4F core. The F3 is almost pin-to-pin compatible with the STM32 F1-series. ... "The STM32 F2-series of STM32 microcontrollers based o

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:50 AM raiden00pl . wrote: > > The F3 is not a good point of comparison. It is like the F1 with a > > Cortex-M4. There will be a lot of differences compared to any > > contemporary parts. Compare instead with one of the F4's. I bet you > > find they are not so differen

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020, 9:29 AM Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We should probably figure out how this patch would be represented in code > > and if we want to have 9.0.0-RC1 or whatever supported. > What do you mean in code? > A release will go through possibly mul

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Notes

I created the PR with the release notes from Confluence. It's here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/801 If there is anything to add/remove/replace let me know. On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:49 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > > Looks good in my opinion > Thanks! > > Alin > > > On Tue, Apr 1

Re: Start of the NuttX 9.0 release cycle

I created the branch, it's up to date with master. >From now on, we only backport to the branch what we think is necessary to the release. > We should probably figure out how this patch would be represented in code > and if we want to have 9.0.0-RC1 or whatever supported. What do you mean in code?

[PATCH] drivers/usbdev/usbmsc.c: fix build error with DEBUGASSERT

Hi, Another recent build failure. Best Regards, Juha From 0ed36626013fc72d25c533a950e6a2ee1100952a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Juha Niskanen Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:11:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] drivers/usbdev/usbmsc.c: fix build error with DEBUGASSERT --- drivers/usbdev/usbmsc.c | 2 +-

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Notes

Looks good in my opinion Thanks! Alin On Tue, Apr 14, 2020, 23:13 Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are there any concerns or additions to the release notes? > I did some re-organisation yesterday. Mainly I put network related > changes to their own section and mo

RE: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

Most of the "video's" and "learning material" for Nuttx is based on the STM32F1. So that's validation enough? And quirks? Which MCU does not have quirks? I benchmarked all kinds of MCU's and every supplier/vendor has quirks and really annoying features and/or other quirks. Documentation, support, e

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

From: raiden00pl . Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 8:49 AM >L1, F1+F3 in a separate directory are a bad idea for me, but L1+F1 >separation looks better. L1+F1 are not really that compatible. Only common thing is that both are quite old and not really used for new projects. L1 is much newer, it w

Re: Adding support for STM32G474RET6

From: Nathan Hartman Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2020 7:07 AM >How do you know whether the IP is the same? By which, I mean: Is there a > better way than to study both datasheets and manually look for differences? Unfortunately that is the only really reliable way. Sometimes there are very mino