Google Summer of Code

Buongiorno Michal I'd like to congratulate with you about the acceptance of the NuttX project "NuttX Support for RapidControl Applications Development with pysimCoder" a the GSOC! I'm very excited to share with you my experience during this project, and I hope that your contribution can help

[ANNOUNCEMENT] NuttX Participating in Google Summer of Code

Hey everyone, We had multiple students this year propose projects for the NuttX project under Apache to Google Summer of Code (GSOC), and I'm excited to share one of them was accepted. Michal Lenc will be working on his project titled: NuttX Support for Rapid Control Applications Development with

Re: Debug nuttx port with IAR

IAR support was, apparently, working in May/August of 2016 when it was incorporated, but I am not aware of anyone that has used it since then.  Support was included in the repository for the STM3220G-EVAL (and for a couple of other STM32 boards), but was removed in November 2017 because it was

Debug nuttx port with IAR

Hi, I am trying to port nuttx to LPC54018 IoT module. I am able to compile port. Now, I want to flash/load binary to the device using IAR. Tried steps documented here :https://github.com/robbie-cao/nuttx/blob/master/configs/stm3220g-eval/README.txt Did not work. Can anyone help me with steps to de

Re: Thread creation in Pony Mail Client

Hi Reto, Are we facing some issue with Apache mailing list? He is not the first person to report issues recently. BR, Alan On 5/17/21, Reto Gähwiler wrote: > Hey there, > > I recently created a new thread and opened it directly inside of the Pony > Mail web-client. This was the previous Tuesd

Thread creation in Pony Mail Client

Hey there, I recently created a new thread and opened it directly inside of the Pony Mail web-client. This was the previous Tuesday or Wednesday (11.5. or 12.5.2021). The thread is still not visible in the mailing list and I am wondering whether it was published, waits for approval or vanished

Re: how to handle backwards compatibility?

Hi Frank-Christian, Third option sounds better, since the difference is only the number of outputs. You don't need to preserve the old pca9635pw_register(), you can change it directly to pca963x_register() and change all the boards that use the pca9635pw_register() to pca963x_register(..., TYPE_P

how to handle backwards compatibility?

Hi. I'm writing several drivers for my custom hardware. One is for a PCA9633 LED driver. I can use the pca9635pw driver for this and modify it so it can be used with PCA9633 (4 outputs), PCA9634 (8 outputs), and PCA9635 (16 outputs) by adding an additional parameter to the driver initalize fu