Re: GitHub actions concurrency

On Mon, May 24, 2021, 2:09 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > I noticed this message [1] from Jarek Potiuk to builds@a.o about a new > concurrency feature of GitHub Actions. Interesting to us? > > [1] > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/202105.mbox/%3cCAH067R=0A0oQhn2SghOKmdj561KvXGKjM

GitHub actions concurrency

I noticed this message [1] from Jarek Potiuk to builds@a.o about a new concurrency feature of GitHub Actions. Interesting to us? [1] https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/202105.mbox/%3cCAH067R=0A0oQhn2SghOKmdj561KvXGKjMG6x_ROQqdf=6vs...@mail.gmail.com%3e Cheers, Nathan

Re: Port of project from NuttX 7.30 to 10.1 RC1: Unexpected IRQ

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:36 AM Sebastien Lorquet wrote: > > Hello, > > There is a typo in the PCA9555 driver at line 817: > CONFIG_TCA64XX_INT_NCALLBACKS is a bad copy paste, should be > CONFIG_PCA9555_INT_NCALLBACKS. Good catch! Please feel free to open a PR. > After this we managed to recomp

Re: (Late) heads-up for new risc-v soc and board

Nice work! Thanks for the contribution! On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:34 PM Janne Rosberg wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Yes, it has FPGA “build-in” so you can do very nice processing with that. > Also 4+1 cores running on 600+Mhz so it’s almost a supercomputer. 😊 > Let’s see what we can squeeze out of it.

Re: (Late) heads-up for new risc-v soc and board

Hi Alan, Yes, it has FPGA “build-in” so you can do very nice processing with that. Also 4+1 cores running on 600+Mhz so it’s almost a supercomputer. 😊 Let’s see what we can squeeze out of it. Later on hoping to get SMP config working…. Janne From: Alan Carvalho de Assis Date: Monday, 24. May 20

Re: (Late) heads-up for new risc-v soc and board

Hi Janne, Very nice! Kudos!!! So, this SoC has FPGA integrated on it? BR, Alan On 5/24/21, Janne Rosberg wrote: > Hi all devs, > > First of all, it’s nice to be back on (public) NuttX development. It’s been > a while since last time. 😊 > > We are doing porting for MicroChip PolarFire Risc-V S

(Late) heads-up for new risc-v soc and board

Hi all devs, First of all, it’s nice to be back on (public) NuttX development. It’s been a while since last time. 😊 We are doing porting for MicroChip PolarFire Risc-V SoC and Icicle evaluation board. Basic things already works (uart and gpios) so we can boot to nsh. First PR #3770 is already “

Re: Dev environment

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 1:04 PM Tim Hardisty wrote: > With thanks to Flavio's suggestion (and .json file to point me in the > right direction) I now have VS Code running under Ubuntu as a full IDE - > edit/build/debug with Segger jlink all from within VS Code > > Had to create custom scripts in t

Re: Dev environment

With thanks to Flavio's suggestion (and .json file to point me in the right direction) I now have VS Code running under Ubuntu as a full IDE - edit/build/debug with Segger jlink all from within VS Code Had to create custom scripts in the launch.json file to ensure no reset on download of nuttx

Re: Port of project from NuttX 7.30 to 10.1 RC1: Unexpected IRQ

https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/issues/3769 Le 24/05/2021 à 17:36, Sebastien Lorquet a écrit : Hello, There is a typo in the PCA9555 driver at line 817: CONFIG_TCA64XX_INT_NCALLBACKS is a bad copy paste, should be CONFIG_PCA9555_INT_NCALLBACKS. After this we managed to recompile o

Port of project from NuttX 7.30 to 10.1 RC1: Unexpected IRQ

Hello, There is a typo in the PCA9555 driver at line 817: CONFIG_TCA64XX_INT_NCALLBACKS is a bad copy paste, should be CONFIG_PCA9555_INT_NCALLBACKS. After this we managed to recompile our project using the latest NuttX sources, but it fails when trying to init the PHY irq on our STM32F427

Re: Nimble on U-blox Nina B112 (Nrf52832)

Sometimes show and disappears the nuttx on my ble scan Enviado do Email para Windows 10

Re: CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS disappeared ?

Okay, thanks. Sebastien Le 24/05/2021 à 11:23, Abdelatif Guettouche a écrit : That option was removed in 9.0, it only affects the SDCC compiler, I think you can remove it in your case. Here is a snippet from the release notes. * Compatibility Concerns - The configuration option

Re: CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS disappeared ?

That option was removed in 9.0, it only affects the SDCC compiler, I think you can remove it in your case. Here is a snippet from the release notes. > * Compatibility Concerns - The configuration option CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCT is now removed. Previously, it was used (at the cost of bre

CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS disappeared ?

Hello, Migrating our system from NuttX 7.30 to current trunk Nothing very bad, just up_arch.h changed to arm_arch.h and it's mostly compiling fine. One of our custom drivers use sigqueue, which requires different types according to CONFIG_CAN_PASS_STRUCTS This config seems to not exist any