>On 11/22/21 5:38 AM, Tim wrote:
>> My thinking now is perhaps to add some sub-feature #defines (e.g.
>>AUDIO_FU_SUBEQUALIZER_BASS_BOOST_PLUS6) to be used as subtypes when
>>capabilities are queried for AUDIO_TYPE_FEATURE and for the audio_configure
>>function to make use of. As far as I see no dri
On 11/22/21 5:38 AM, Tim wrote:
Thanks Alan - I do agree it isn't a custom feature. The subsystem has "Feature Units"
which includes "AUDIO_FU_EQUALIZER" as a control. This doesn't seem to be implemented for
any processors or boards that I can see, nor is there any generic code for this; just t
Thanks Alan - I do agree it isn't a custom feature. The subsystem has "Feature
Units" which includes "AUDIO_FU_EQUALIZER" as a control. This doesn't seem to
be implemented for any processors or boards that I can see, nor is there any
generic code for this; just the #define in include/audio.h.
M
Hi Tim,
Since some audio codec supports these features, I think the audio
subsystem of NuttX needs to be prepared to support it, doesn't seen to
be like a "custom" feature.
But even on Linux these features seams a little hidden on ALSA and you
need to right tool to get access to it, see:
https:/
Thanks David - I saw that my emails are in the archive but since my email
address always seems to get a .INVALID suffix applied in the From: field
(really got no idea why!) I was not 100% sure they were being
distributed/reflected reliably.
>Hi Tim,
>
>Emails are getting to the list.
>
>David
>
Hi Tim,
Emails are getting to the list.
David
-Original Message-
From: Tim
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 3:26 AM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: RE: Custom audio capabilities
I appreciate no one may have any comments or suggestions but since I have
had no replies to my last 2 or 3
Hi,
Thank you for yor time, both of you. Finally, it's working. There were two
issues. Firstly, as Alan wrote in the second mail, I missed the information
in README that I can't access nsh strictly via USB. Secondly, the previous
pico-sdk version (git reset --hard 26653ea81e340) was not working, b
I appreciate no one may have any comments or suggestions but since I have had
no replies to my last 2 or 3 questions, could someone kindly just reply with a
"hello" or something, simply to confirm my emails are getting through OK?
>-Original Message-
>From: TimH
>Sent: 21 November 2021
