On 8/10/2023 4:23 PM, Josh Lange wrote:
First of all, thanks to everyone involved in the NuttX project. We
really appreciate all the work that has gone into keeping this
operating system maintained and functional on a wide variety of hardware.
We have several different NuttX-based projects
First of all, thanks to everyone involved in the NuttX project. We
really appreciate all the work that has gone into keeping this operating
system maintained and functional on a wide variety of hardware.
We have several different NuttX-based projects that are using both
LPC1769 and LPC4078
Hi Nathan,
On 8/10/23, Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 4:38 AM Tim Hardisty
> wrote:
>
>> I like your idea of IOCTLs - I will be revisiting this issue in the next
>> few weeks and will look to see what's involved in implementing this as it
>> "feels" right.
>>
>
> snip
>
> In
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 4:38 AM Tim Hardisty
wrote:
> I like your idea of IOCTLs - I will be revisiting this issue in the next
> few weeks and will look to see what's involved in implementing this as it
> "feels" right.
>
snip
In trying to cover potential board faults, I have found that if
>
Thanks David - whilst I perhaps could of searched for that, it is why I
asked here as I was sure someone else was likely to have seen this.
I like your idea of IOCTLs - I will be revisiting this issue in the next
few weeks and will look to see what's involved in implementing this as
it
Tim,
See https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/3927
David
-Original Message-
From: Alan C. Assis
Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 3:47 PM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Cc: Pavel Pisa
Subject: Re: CAN TX fail handling
Hi Tim,
Agree! This behavior could be implemented in the driver, for
