+1 for the idea
On Fri, 4 Jul 2025, 00:57 Matteo Golin, wrote:
> I really like this idea, it will make it much easier to enforce
> documentation with PRs. When I wrote the syslogd app I'm fairly sure my
> kernel changes (nuttx repo) got merged with the docs a few days before the
> application wa
I really like this idea, it will make it much easier to enforce
documentation with PRs. When I wrote the syslogd app I'm fairly sure my
kernel changes (nuttx repo) got merged with the docs a few days before the
application was actually merged, which meant that for a few days there was
documentation
Hi all,
Right now, Documentation is in the main nuttx repository [1].
However, some of the Documentation there pertains to the nuttx-apps
repository. One current example is PR #16665 in nuttx repo, which is
documenting the new Xedge example located in the nuttx-apps repo.
I think it's a little b
[+1] for all Espressif-supported boards and chips, namely:
esp32_devkitc
esp32_wrover_kit
esp32_ethernet_kit
esp32_lyrat
esp32_pico_kit
esp32s2_saola
esp32s2_kaluga
esp32s3_devkit
esp32s3_korvo_2
esp32s3_box
esp32s3_eye
esp32c3_generic
esp32c6_devkitc
esp32c6_devkitm
esp32h2_devkit
esp32s3_lcd_ev
+1
STM32F103-Minimum:
Compiler:
$ arm-none-eabi-gcc -v
...
Thread model: single
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.2.1 20231009 (15:13.2.rel1-2)
Compilation:
$ ./tools/configure.sh stm32f103-minimum:nsh
$ make -j
Size:
$ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
text databssd
I'll trigger our internal CI for RC0. Come back soon with the results.
Em qui., 3 de jul. de 2025 às 09:22, Alin Jerpelea
escreveu:
> Hi KR,
>
> as a community member you can vote with +1/0/-1 for each release. Every
> test and vote counts
>
> Best regards
> Alin
>
> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025, 15:13 Al
Hi KR,
as a community member you can vote with +1/0/-1 for each release. Every
test and vote counts
Best regards
Alin
On Thu, 3 Jul 2025, 15:13 Alan C. Assis, wrote:
> Hi KR,
>
> In order to register this information for future reference (for comparison
> about bloat size, compiler error, etc)
Hi KR,
In order to register this information for future reference (for comparison
about bloat size, compiler error, etc), could you please include:
Compiler version (i.e. "$ avr-gcc -v")
NuttX size (ie. "$ avr-size nuttx")
Free memory in the nuttshell ("nsh> free")
BR,
Alan
On Thu, Jul 3, 2
Hello,
I did some basic tests for AVR (AVR128DA28), everything seems to be fine
(casting no vote as I am not a PMC member and and I only used sources
from git and the tests done were really basic.)
Best regards
On 2025-06-30 07:05, Alin Jerpelea wrote:
Hello all,
Apache NuttX 12.10.0 RC0 h
Hi all,
I already filed the bug (https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/16668)
and the patch (https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/16669), just
bringing it up here for discussion.
I think this was originally affecting stm32 (generic) only, but when
we ported the error message frame generation to
10 matches
Mail list logo
