Hello Greg and others,
On Thursday 14 of September 2023 17:19:16 Gregory Nutt wrote:
> On 9/14/2023 8:52 AM, Alan C. Assis wrote:
> > I think the authors of the driver can release the source code using
> > two or more licenses.
> > cd c
> > We already have an example of it in NuttX: SocketCAN
> >
On 9/14/2023 8:52 AM, Alan C. Assis wrote:
I think the authors of the driver can release the source code using
two or more licenses.
cd c
We already have an example of it in NuttX: SocketCAN
Since they add the OR license clause it is fine.
The part that bothers me is that I cannot tell which
I think the authors of the driver can release the source code using
two or more licenses.
We already have an example of it in NuttX: SocketCAN
Since they add the OR license clause it is fine.
BR,
Alan
On 9/14/23, Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> Hi Pavel,
>
> small oftopic regarding the license
Hi Pavel,
small oftopic regarding the license header:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-compatibility.en.html
"Apache 2.0, has patent clauses which are incompatible with GPL version 2;
since I think those patent clauses are good, I made GPL version 3
compatible with them."
Best regards
Hello Alin, Brennan and Andrew,
On Tuesday 12 of September 2023 19:39:31 Alin Jerpelea wrote:
> from my knowledge the GPL code is disabled by default and users MUST
> manually enable it
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 6:26 PM Brennan Ashton
>
> wrote:
> > I'm very confused as to the issue here. This
e Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On 9/7/23, Peter van der Perk wrote:
> > > > There was a discussion when the kconfig GPL switch got introduced.
> > > > The libcanutils code from my pe
ssion when the kconfig GPL switch got introduced.
> > > The libcanutils code from my perspective would be interpreted as BSD-3.
> > > But it was decided otherwise
> > > https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/833#issuecomment-918875006
> > >
> > > -
/pull/833#issuecomment-918875006
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Nutt
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 3:50 PM
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: CTU CAN FD driver multi-licence for Nuttx
>
> On 9/6/2023 5:15 AM, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote
On 9/7/23, Brennan Ashton wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:01 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
>>
>> > I think GPL code shouldn't be included directly, but I think it is
>> > fair to allow GPL code be downloaded using the building system case
>> > user selected it.
>>
>> We created this directory
On Thu, Sep 7, 2023, 9:01 AM Gregory Nutt wrote:
>
> > I think GPL code shouldn't be included directly, but I think it is
> > fair to allow GPL code be downloaded using the building system case
> > user selected it.
>
> We created this directory specifically to hold forks of GPL code that
> can
I think GPL code shouldn't be included directly, but I think it is
fair to allow GPL code be downloaded using the building system case
user selected it.
We created this directory specifically to hold forks of GPL code that
can be used with NuttX: https://github.com/NuttX . I am not sure
rom my perspective would be interpreted as BSD-3.
> But it was decided otherwise
> https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/833#issuecomment-918875006
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gregory Nutt
> Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 3:50 PM
> To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
>
: Thursday, September 7, 2023 3:50 PM
To: dev@nuttx.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: CTU CAN FD driver multi-licence for Nuttx
On 9/6/2023 5:15 AM, alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote:
> There are known CAN sources that have GPL code and have been
> documented in the LICENSE File
>
> All this code
13 matches
Mail list logo
