Hi,
> I personally deliberately avoided number of commits/PRs in the report
> as I saw Justin giving the same remark in his review to other reports
> that did that, and I believe he has a good argument.
I’s not just my point, the board frequently gives the same feedback on reports
that just cont
Hi,
I personally deliberately avoided number of commits/PRs in the report
as I saw Justin giving the same remark in his review to other reports
that did that, and I believe he has a good argument.
Probably a better stats would be number of PRs from new contributors,
that will show that the projec
+1 to more metrics about community, code changes, etc. I have signed off in any
case.
-Flavio
> On 6 Feb 2020, at 03:27, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> HI,
>
>> Instead of giving absolute numbers, why not say there was an increase of x%
>> in the number of PRs applied, etc
>
> Which is slightly be
HI,
> Instead of giving absolute numbers, why not say there was an increase of x%
> in the number of PRs applied, etc
Which is slightly better but without context or explanation to why this
happened it’s mostly meaningless for people outside the project.
Thanks,
Justin
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 5:12 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> HI,
>
> > - Is it possible to mention the count of commits, contributors in the
> report.
> > - Also can we mentions who many discussions happened in the mailing list
> and how many people participated in the discussion.
>
> Only if it adds so
HI,
> - Is it possible to mention the count of commits, contributors in the report.
>
> - Also can we mentions who many discussions happened in the mailing list and
> how many people participated in the discussion.
Only if it adds something to the report.
> These are the non-technical deta
Hi Justin,
I signed off the report, just a trivial suggestion on the report:
- Is it possible to mention the count of commits, contributors in the report.
- Also can we mentions who many discussions happened in the mailing list and
how many people participated in the discussion.
Th
Hi Justin,
Thanks.
Sorry about that, I thought I double checked everything.
We'll be more vigilant next time.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020, 02:49 Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just submitted it.
>
> Thanks for that, it looks fine and I’ve signed dit off.
>
> In future please follow the formatting
Hi,
> I just submitted it.
Thanks for that, it looks fine and I’ve signed dit off.
In future please follow the formatting guidelines at the top of the page and
don’t change the spacing from the template, I’ve fixed it this time.
In particular:
• Keep all lines under 76 characters long
Hi Justin,
I just submitted it.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 1:01 AM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Don't forget the report is due today.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
Hi,
Don't forget the report is due today.
Thanks,
Justin
> I stand corrected, those must have been the ones from testing. Maybe it
> needs to be redirected to commits@, I don't know.
We would probably want that as well.
testing is expected to see more traffic in the up coming days.
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 10:57 PM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> They are? I think they got redirected to commit@.
> Only the testing repo still got its discussions forwarded to dev@.
> At least this is how I see them.
I stand corrected, those must have been the on
They are? I think they got redirected to commit@.
Only the testing repo still got its discussions forwarded to dev@.
At least this is how I see them.
On Sun, Feb 2, 2020, 03:37 Nathan Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 5:24 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
> abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 1, 2020 at 5:24 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have noticed there seem to be less discussion happening on mailing,
> and there may be some conversion happening off-list, which may be an issue
> that needs to be looked into. But just about all pod
Hi,
Yes, it is light. Not a lot of things have changed since the last report.
However, this is not the last version, it will get updated during the
next couple of days.
> I have noticed there seem to be less discussion happening on mailing, and
> there may be some conversion happening off-list,
Hi,
> There already is a draft:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/February+2020
> We would appreciate your usual feedback.
No major feedback but it seems a little light on for detail. Have a look at
some of the previous incubator reports [1], you see some piddling reports are
Hi Justin,
There already is a draft:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/February+2020
We would appreciate your usual feedback.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:31 PM Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> it a good idea to start working on the report early so people can give
> feedback on it
Hi,
it a good idea to start working on the report early so people can give feedback
on it, a week before it is due is the suggestion. Who on the PPMC would like to
try getting a draft together first?
Thanks,
Justin
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 February 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 February 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 February 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 February 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will for
23 matches
Mail list logo
