Sounds good so far - keep up the good work :)
Regards
Gary
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Aaron Anderson wrote:
> HI Gary,
>
> I agree 100% that all of our immediate focus should be on enhancing ODE 1.X
> and the prototype that I have envisioned is still months from completion.
> With the OM
HI Gary,
I agree 100% that all of our immediate focus should be on enhancing ODE 1.X and
the prototype that I have envisioned is still months from completion. With the
OModel discussion I thought it would be an opportune time to discuss ODE's
future directions. At this point I was only looking
Hi Jeff,
I put what I have at https://github.com/aaronanderson/ODE-X
Regards,
Aaron
--- On Fri, 3/25/11, Jeff Yu wrote:
From: Jeff Yu
Subject: Re: Evolvable OModel
To: dev@ode.apache.org, aander...@apache.org
Date: Friday, March 25, 2011, 4:57 AM
Hi Aaron,
I am interested in this work, it w
Hi Aaron,
I am interested in this work, it would be a great idea that you can put it
somewhere on the github. ;-)
Regards
Jeff
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Aaron Anderson wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Sorry I missed the call earlier this week; due to the daylight savings time
> change in the US
Hi Kurt
I agree with your point - however I believe that was the goal of
Aaron's second bullet, so that his engine does not need to worry about
integration.
Aaron - the project sounds interesting, and would definitely be worth
making public (probably github is the best choice for now though).
>F
