Sanjiva,
Thanks for the pointer, I'll do that.
-mbs
On 8/31/07, Sanjiva Weerawarana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Maciej,
>
> > JMS will work with Axis2 as it currently does (that is to say there is a
> > possibility of messages being lost). Reliable JMS will require a little
> bit
> > more
Hi Maciej,
JMS will work with Axis2 as it currently does (that is to say there is a
possibility of messages being lost). Reliable JMS will require a little bit
more cooperation from AXIS. The specific problem is in reliable, we'd need
axis to start a TX when a message is received from a partner
+1 from me
2007/8/31, Maciej Szefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If you have a custom IL, then there will be some small changes
> (for the better), otherwise there's no user-visible differences.
>
> -mbs
>
> On 8/31/07, Paul Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 to get it merged into trunk and ba
JMS will work with Axis2 as it currently does (that is to say there is a
possibility of messages being lost). Reliable JMS will require a little bit
more cooperation from AXIS. The specific problem is in reliable, we'd need
axis to start a TX when a message is received from a partner (i.e. a reques
+1. Let's take the trunk (essentially 1.1) and send it into a maintenance
branch (based on feedback, we might want to do a 1.1.1)
What are the current options for reliable and transacted invocations with
the two current ILs? For example, does JMS work with Axis2/JBI? How about
transacted?
Ar
If you have a custom IL, then there will be some small changes
(for the better), otherwise there's no user-visible differences.
-mbs
On 8/31/07, Paul Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 to get it merged into trunk and baked. Sounds like good material
> for a 1.2 release. Are there any incom
+1 to get it merged into trunk and baked. Sounds like good material
for a 1.2 release. Are there any incompatibilities introduced, i.e.,
will someone's 1.1 setup work (without modification) in 1.2?
-- Paul
On 8/31/07, Maciej Szefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With 1.1 all spiced a
Hi all,
With 1.1 all spiced and cured, I'd like to merge BART branch into the trunk.
As a a reminder (its been a while) the BART branch is a refactor of the
engine that provides several benefits:
1. Simplified integration -- in particular it is no longer necessary to
start transactions in the IL
