Adrian,
I think it is a good idea, but I don't think that the production runs
are the only work effort selected: at least the EVENT work effort should
be selected as well...
The new input parameter should be probebly a List and not a String.
Jacopo
Adrian Crum wrote:
I just noticed the Work
Hi Si,
i get the following warning in the log:
[FieldNameGT30] Column name [ADDITIONAL_SHIPPING_CHARGE_DESC] of entity
Shipment is longer than 30 characters.
Regards, Hans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David E. Jones closed OFBIZ-1226.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: David E. Jones
Thanks for re
I just noticed the WorkEffortServices.getWorkEffortEventsByPeriod(...) method only returns work
efforts related to production runs. The end result is, the work effort calendar displays only
production run related events.
I'd like to remove the hard-coded production run entity conditions and ins
It would be best to use the required and tooltip styles. If the project gets restyled in the future,
then your UI elements will be updated automatically.
-Adrian
Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi all,
i wanted to mark a field like required but could not decide how to do it,
because i see 3 different w
Hi all,
i wanted to mark a field like required but could not decide how to do it,
because i see 3 different ways:
1) the old way, marked only with a *
2) with class="tooltip" ${uiLabelMap.CommonRequired}
3) with input/field class="required" (this is the gray background of the
input) plus tooltip
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525205
]
Si Chen commented on OFBIZ-1226:
It does not appear that the default-value in
is being respected.
> update
updateReturnHeader broken by createTrackingCodeOrderReturns
---
Key: OFBIZ-1226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1226
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12525185
]
Bilgin Ibryam commented on OFBIZ-882:
-
I also agree that Item Seq Id is not needed for most of the ofbiz users. At
Thanks!
Adrian Crum wrote:
> Vince,
>
> That change has been made, rev 573018.
>
> -Adrian
>
> Vince Clark wrote:
>
>> We could use that.
>>
>> Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> I'm getting ready to deploy the Asset Maintenance component here. I'm
>>> going to change the UI a little so that the Main Navig
Vince,
That change has been made, rev 573018.
-Adrian
Vince Clark wrote:
We could use that.
Adrian Crum wrote:
I'm getting ready to deploy the Asset Maintenance component here. I'm
going to change the UI a little so that the Main Navigation tab bar is
always visible - by converting the Ass
We could use that.
Adrian Crum wrote:
> I'm getting ready to deploy the Asset Maintenance component here. I'm
> going to change the UI a little so that the Main Navigation tab bar is
> always visible - by converting the Asset Maintenance tabs
> Equipments/Maintenances/Warehouse to an App Navigatio
I'm getting ready to deploy the Asset Maintenance component here. I'm going to change the UI a
little so that the Main Navigation tab bar is always visible - by converting the Asset Maintenance
tabs Equipments/Maintenances/Warehouse to an App Navigation tab bar.
Would this mod be worth contribu
13 matches
Mail list logo
