[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Scott Gray closed OFBIZ-1718.
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Assignee: Scott Gray
I couldn't find anything wrong on this one
> Mod
I recently noticed the following lines in the AccountingTypeData.xml
file (starting around line 511):
enumTypeId="TAXABLE_INV_ITM_TY" hasTable="N" parentTypeId=""/>
enumCode="INV_SALES_TAX" enumId="INV_SALES_TAX" sequenceId="01"
enumTypeId="TAXABLE_INV_ITM_TY"/>
enumCode="ITM_SALES_TAX" en
Hi David
Curiosity got the better of me, Si put it in last year, so I wouldn't hold
your breathe for a response on this.
Regards
Scott
2008/4/23 David E Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I recently noticed the following lines in the AccountingTypeData.xml file
> (starting around line 511):
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Brajesh Patel updated OFBIZ-1440:
-
Attachment: Review_EditAcctgTrans_Screens_issue.patch
> UI: Review/Improve/Cleanup the /accountin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591586#action_12591586
]
Mridul Pathak commented on OFBIZ-1642:
--
In the find form we can have a drop-down for p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12591589#action_12591589
]
Mridul Pathak commented on OFBIZ-1642:
--
In Create Contact form, for now the most basic
Hi All
I have a form where I want to hide the extra options created when using the
text-find element, I was thinking of adding a new attribute like this:
Isn't this
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ofbiz-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
a similar enumeration abuse?
-Bruno
2008/4/23 Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi David
>
> Curiosity got the better of me, Si put it in last year, so I wouldn't hold
> your breathe for a response on th
Happy hour promotions
-
Key: OFBIZ-1756
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1756
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: product
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: Bilg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1756?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bilgin Ibryam updated OFBIZ-1756:
-
Attachment: happy_hour_promo.patch
> Happy hour promotions
> -
>
>
Hi all,
I just created new happy hour promotion condition, you can check it here
OFBIZ-1756.
It works this way:
First you have to create a TechDataCalendarWeek. There you can specify
for every day of the week a different time range for the happy hours
(mondayStartTime="16:00:00" mondayCapacity="7
yes... and no :)
That is an example of something that should be completed and
refactored; the reasonId in the IIDetail, in my opinion, should
reference to a new entity IIDReasonType (or similar) and the
VarianceReason (the names of the entities may not be correct, I'm just
using my memory)
Hi Bilgin,
Did not test your patch yet (only cursorily reviewed), but it sounds like a
good idea and well done.
Hi all,
I just created new happy hour promotion condition, you can check it here
OFBIZ-1756.
It works this way:
First you have to create a TechDataCalendarWeek. There you can speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur reassigned OFBIZ-1440:
--
Assignee: Vikas Mayur (was: Ashish Vijaywargiya)
> UI: Review/Improve/Cleanup the /accounting/
One thing to consider is that the TechDataCalendarWeek entity may
eventually be deprecated in favour of using the WorkEffort (with
workEffortTypeId="AVAILABLE") and Recurrence* entities.
-David
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:26 AM, Bilgin Ibryam wrote:
Hi all,
I just created new happy hour promo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Mayur closed OFBIZ-1440.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Brajesh,
Yours patch is in trunk rev 650883.
> UI: Review/Improve/Cleanup the
Hello all,
I saw the implementation of service deletePartyRelationship
In the service it use remove-value which deletes the record form the
database. But here i think It should expire.
Please make me correct if i am wrong.
Thanks
Sumit Pandit
17 matches
Mail list logo