[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bilgin Ibryam closed OFBIZ-1979.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Joe,
I had no change to test your path, but you said you use it already..
Hi Adam,
I was not aware of all the context. From this thread
http://lists.ofbiz.org/pipermail/dev/2004-March/004381.html I see now what you
mean.
I agree that Oscar's solution is missing operators (your solution with
EntityCondition allows operators) and that I should have used
prepared statem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642550#action_12642550
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1999:
Please consider that the portalPageImages.zip cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruno Busco updated OFBIZ-1999:
---
Attachment: portalPages.patch
Hi,
I have added localization to the patch.
I think the patch is now re
Thanks David, that all makes perfect sense.
Next question :-)
Some of the minilang operations need to be revised I think, for
example uses string as the default type and defaults
to a Double. I'm wondering if we should make the type attribute
required, I've seen bugs in the past because people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-2008:
--
Assignee: (was: Jacques Le Roux)
> Tools to extract messages from *Labels.xml files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642555#action_12642555
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1954:
Still interested Dimitri ?
> Generate alt
Sandbox: Improved Data Type handling in Mini-language
-
Key: OFBIZ-2019
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2019
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Ad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-1992.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Bru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum updated OFBIZ-2019:
---
Attachment: FieldTypeConversion.patch
I started working on this, but I ran into unexpected problems,
Ok forget what I said about the set element, it does give out the type
that it took in. I still think we need to do something about
calculate though.
Regards
Scott
2008/10/25 Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks David, that all makes perfect sense.
>
> Next question :-)
> Some of the minilan
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2019
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Scott Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Entity Field Type Checking and Move BigDecimal versus Double
> Stuff
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2008, 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1972?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642560#action_12642560
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1972:
Finally I gave up on the hat issue idea :
Yes, set gives you back what you send in unless you specify a type,
then is tries to convert it.
The calculate operation does use BigDecimal internally and then
converts to a Double by default. Previous I didn't change the default
to BigDecimal (actually tried it) because it caused too ma
Hi,
I am having little difficulty to envision, What Ofbiz will look like a
year or two down the road?
I am personally satisfied with most of core technologies of ofbiz
except for Form widget. Form widgets needs some enhancements and even
those don't seem too difficult. Ofbiz framework tech
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12642579#action_12642579
]
Bilgin Ibryam commented on OFBIZ-1954:
--
Jacques, Dimitri
I found the error in patch a
Anil,
These are really great questions to ask, and I am excited to see this
thread start. Let me be the first to say, I agree with you 100% that
now is the time to plan for the future.
When we started OFBiz in 2001, the tools available were less powerful
and less appealing than the ones a
Jacques,
It might be good to revert temporarily until the solution is refined,
especially the design aspects of it.
-David
On Oct 24, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Adam,
I was not aware of all the context. From this thread http://lists.ofbiz.org/pipermail/dev/2004-March/00
Thanks Anil for starting this thread. I have been asking these very
questions many time while working on the OFBiz. Your POV about the
concentration on applications instead of the framework is something very
interesting. I found OFBiz community two good things about the OFBiz and
community. OFB
I guess I am left in the dust.
I am not up on the "Java enterprise application development tool"
as far as JEE recommended style, ofbiz allows many presentation layers,
all that needs is the handler.
The key here was that the data could be changes in the lower levels
(entities) and there was no wor
20 matches
Mail list logo
