Perhaps at the same time convert it to the docbook format and put it in
ofbiz? In confuence a link can be put to the actual document similar
like: http://demo.ofbiz.org/cmssite/cms/APACHE_OFBIZ_HTML ?
regards,
Hans
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 10:23 +0530, Ashish Vijaywargiya wrote:
Hello Jacques
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750289#action_12750289
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-2110:
---
Why?
Add initialAccount field to SalesOpportunity
Somebody put a comment on the list that there should be a 'base' list
i.e. a list of all functions in the system.
If we would use the docbook xml format then.
this new feature list and a 'base' list can be created avoiding
duplicate text. That means when a new feature is created, it can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750293#action_12750293
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2110:
To speed up things, seems to work :)
Add
Hi Hans,
Before answering : I have sent a message to user ML about docbook, what do you think
about an easy editor ?
Jacques
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Somebody put a comment on the list that there should be a 'base' list
i.e. a list of all functions in the system.
If
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2838.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 9.04
macro to display error messages individually besides each input field
-
Key: OFBIZ-2890
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2890
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type:
So long as we're in agreement that outstanding issues shouldn't be
closed solely due to a lack of activity.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 2/09/2009, at 6:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Abdullah Shaikh updated OFBIZ-2890:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-2890_macro to display error messages individually.patch
Added fieldErrors
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Hi Jacques
We did not yet found a good WYSIWYG editor. However the xml editors in
Eclipse provide a reasonable environment in creating the text files.
Also realize that these files are now part of the ofbiz system which is
the domain of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-2886.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Amit Rishi - Done at r810434.
--
Ashish
Add support on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750372#action_12750372
]
Amit Sharma commented on OFBIZ-2886:
Thanks Ashish!
--
Amit Sharma
Add support on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2890.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Thanks Abdullah,
Your patch is in trunk at
Done at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2206
Thanks Sebastian
Jacques
From: sebb seb...@gmail.com
On 18/08/2009, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
It seems that we are unable to do it ourself. Could you help, or tell how
we could get some help,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2374.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Vadiraj,
I commited your patch in trunk at revision: 810581.
I also
ie6 and bluelight
-
Key: OFBIZ-2891
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: ALL COMPONENTS
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES updated OFBIZ-2891:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2891.patch
stupidIE6.png
ie6 and bluelight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-2882:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2882_EntityCacheListTest.patch
This file contains a new unit test class for cache
Thanks a lot Jacques and Ashish,
I appreciate your help and glad that my work finally gets into the source :)
-Vadiraj.
Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bob Morley updated OFBIZ-2882:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-2882_EntityCacheListFix.patch
Includes the fix as well as the entitytests.xml update
I have attached to files to the patch. The one has a unittest that exposes
the problem with the caching. The second contains two fixes that resolve
the issue (and cause the unittest to pass).
--
View this message in context:
One question that was posed to me today was why a store operation on a
GenericValue causes the database to get hit with a basically noop database
update. A couple of things that were interesting:
- GenericEntity.set(...) will (unless value is null and null is ignored)
always run through logic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750569#action_12750569
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2889:
As I mentioned on the mailing list, I think this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750575#action_12750575
]
Derek Young commented on OFBIZ-2468:
Arun's patch worked for me.
Thanks.
Links to
Hello David and the List:
Well, seems I've been able to add the content I'd like to have placed in
the OFBADMIN space to the OFBIZ Wiki space. Please take a look:
http://docs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=9071
Would it be possible to have this moved over to the OFBADMIN space and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750598#action_12750598
]
Harmeet Bedi commented on OFBIZ-2889:
-
I assume if there is no actions block, it would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750607#action_12750607
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-2891:
Hi Erwan,
I did not read all the article
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750609#action_12750609
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-2889:
The current form behavior is preserved: if child
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750612#action_12750612
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-2891:
---
Hi Jacques,
I've also tested in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750618#action_12750618
]
David E. Jones commented on OFBIZ-2889:
---
The run-parent-actions element would have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-2891.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Thanks Erwan,
Your patch is in trunk at
Hi David
I'm not familiar with the code but the condition seems a little
strange to me, it used to be this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code in
the block
Now it looks like this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP AND productStore requirement is
also
You're missing the nots...
-David
On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:28 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi David
I'm not familiar with the code but the condition seems a little
strange to me, it used to be this:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code
in the block
Now it looks
I saw them but yeah I have read the code wrong, my pseudo code should
have an OR instead of an AND:
if product requirement is PRODRQM_ATP OR productStore requirement is
PRODRQM_ATP then run the rest of the code in the block
shouldn't one setting take priority or override over the other? If
Thanks for the comments Scott. I made some changes that will hopefully
address these two issues, ie making it more readable and allowing the
Product setting to override the ProductStore setting, in SVN rev 810772.
-David
On Sep 2, 2009, at 7:53 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
I saw them but yeah
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-2374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12750823#action_12750823
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya commented on OFBIZ-2374:
Thanks a lot Jacques for
Hi Ashish,
No problems. I wish to continue to watch the community and get involved
as the opportunities rise.
I would like to help with any future support on this issue too :)
Thanks,
-Vadiraj.
Ashish Vijaywargiya (JIRA) wrote:
[
37 matches
Mail list logo
