You are right David, after loading seed it worked. Thanks for the quick
reply.
Regards,
Hans
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 01:18 -0600, David E Jones wrote:
> You should be able to. Did you reload the seed data to get the new
> permissions in place?
>
> -David
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:42 AM, Hans
You should be able to. Did you reload the seed data to get the new permissions
in place?
-David
On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:42 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:
> with admin we cannot login to myportal anymore.
>
>
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 07:47 +, jone...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: jonesde
>> Dat
with admin we cannot login to myportal anymore.
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 07:47 +, jone...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jonesde
> Date: Thu Jan 14 07:47:32 2010
> New Revision: 899088
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899088&view=rev
> Log:
> Some permissions changes so that webpos an
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r899053 -
> /ofbiz/branches/executioncontext20091231/framework/context/src/org/ofbiz/context/ContextUtil.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 3:54 PM
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > T res
--- On Thu, 1/14/10, Adrian Crum wrote:
> From: Adrian Crum
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r899053 -
> /ofbiz/branches/executioncontext20091231/framework/context/src/org/ofbiz/context/ContextUtil.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 4:23 PM
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Adr
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
T result = Controller.runWith(data, new Callable() {
public T call() throws Exception {
// code
return null;
}
});
I've actually attempted this, and while I think the implementation of
this patter
Adrian Crum wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>> Adam Heath wrote:
>>> T result = Controller.runWith(data, new Callable() {
>>> public T call() throws Exception {
>>> // code
>>> return null;
>>> }
>>> });
>>
>> I've actually attempted this, and while I think the implementation of
On 14/01/2010, at 1:50 AM, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erwan
Date: Thu Jan 14 08:50:56 2010
New Revision: 899120
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899120&view=rev
Log:
Committing OFBIZ-3319 "reduced patch"
Keep in mind that a jira ID is not a commit description and regardless
of wha
Adam Heath wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
T result = Controller.runWith(data, new Callable() {
public T call() throws Exception {
// code
return null;
}
});
I've actually attempted this, and while I think the implementation of
this pattern is simple, actually *using* it in hi
Adam Heath wrote:
> T result = Controller.runWith(data, new Callable() {
> public T call() throws Exception {
> // code
> return null;
> }
> });
I've actually attempted this, and while I think the implementation of
this pattern is simple, actually *using* it in higher-level
Adam Heath wrote:
ps: OfbizSecurityTransform.execute() should call pushExecutionArtifact
outside of the try, not inside.
Good point. That will need to be fixed in a number of places.
Adam Heath wrote:
> Adrian Crum wrote:
>> By evaluated I mean on a higher level than what you're doing here. I
>> need the *concept* evaluated and commented on. Will this approach to
>> security work? Can we agree on its advantages? Try converting a
>> component over to the new security - was it ea
The Buildbot has detected a restored build of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2327
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 8993
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-trunk on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/2326
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/trunk] 899360
Adrian Crum wrote:
> Adam Heath wrote:
>> It's generally bad form have an object take a parameter, then not
>> internalize said parameter. Ie, the array constructor doesn't take
>> ownership of the pathElementArray, thereby allowing calling code to
>> manipulate it. If this is by design, it shoul
Adam Heath wrote:
It's generally bad form have an object take a parameter, then not
internalize said parameter. Ie, the array constructor doesn't take
ownership of the pathElementArray, thereby allowing calling code to
manipulate it. If this is by design, it should be listed as such in
the java
doo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: doogie
Date: Thu Jan 14 17:50:55 2010
New Revision: 899328
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=899328&view=rev
Log:
Replace all tabs with spaces.
Thanks! I have Eclipse set up to use spaces instead of tabs, but when I
run one of Eclipse's code wizards it use
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
I noticed that too. If a component doesn't have a lib folder, then the
build fails.
Actually, not completely correct. If a component does *not* have a
lib folder, but *does* include a reference in it's local build.xml,
then it fails.
When creating a new c
Adrian Crum wrote:
> I noticed that too. If a component doesn't have a lib folder, then the
> build fails.
Actually, not completely correct. If a component does *not* have a
lib folder, but *does* include a reference in it's local build.xml,
then it fails.
When creating a new component, if it do
I noticed that too. If a component doesn't have a lib folder, then the
build fails.
-Adrian
Adam Heath wrote:
I'm currently looking at the executioncontext branch, and noticed
something in it's api/build.xml. It makes use of a ${lib.dir} to
include local jars into it's classpath. The assumpt
I'm currently looking at the executioncontext branch, and noticed
something in it's api/build.xml. It makes use of a ${lib.dir} to
include local jars into it's classpath. The assumption being you
might want to change the value of that.
However, it then hard-codes the lib name when accessing othe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12800266#action_12800266
]
Erwan de FERRIERES commented on OFBIZ-3381:
---
2)
"fa = delegator.findByPrimaryKey
Adam Heath wrote:
Hmm. I just switched my checkout to your branch. I'm seeing some
things that need to be reviewed. I'm going to need to make some time
for this.
Initially, ArtifactPath implements Iterator. I would have
done that as Iterable, which would then allow ArtifactPath to
be used in
jaco...@apache.org wrote:
> Modified:
> ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/envops/Loop.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/framework/minilang/src/org/ofbiz/minilang/method/envops/Loop.java?rev=899116&r1=899115&r2=899116&view=diff
>
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Wed, 1/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r899053 -
>> /ofbiz/branches/executioncontext20091231/framework/context/src/org/ofbiz/context/ContextUtil.java
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Cc: comm...@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Wedne
Looks like the error is not on my side. No time to look at it further right
now...
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/89/steps/compile/logs/stdio
Anyway it build locally too so should not be an issue for us right now. I will
report later to infra...
Jacques
From:
The Buildbot
Sorry wrong release, fixed
From:
Author: jleroux
Revision: 890249
Modified property: svn:log
Modified: svn:log at Thu Jan 14 14:42:44 2010
--
--- svn:log (original)
+++ svn:log Thu Jan 14 14:42:44 2010
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of ofbiz-branch9 on ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch9/builds/89
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: isis_ubuntu
Build Reason:
Build Source Stamp: [branch ofbiz/branches/rel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3410.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
Release Branch 9.04
Introduce Localization Packages in General Ledger
-
Key: OFBIZ-3411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3411
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: accounting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
chris snow updated OFBIZ-3410:
--
Attachment: buildXmlCreateReaders.patch
> build.xml run-install-readers error
> ---
build.xml run-install-readers error
---
Key: OFBIZ-3410
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3410
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: SVN trunk
Reporter: chris snow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES closed OFBIZ-3319.
-
Resolution: Fixed
at rev. 899120
> Adding selenium-server library, and documentation upd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Erwan de FERRIERES reassigned OFBIZ-3319:
-
Assignee: Erwan de FERRIERES
> Adding selenium-server library, and documentation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Vijaywargiya closed OFBIZ-3409.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: Release Branch 9.04)
Thanks Amit & Vi
Le 11/01/2010 19:54, Scott Gray a écrit :
On 11/01/2010, at 9:01 PM, er...@apache.org wrote:
+
Isn't the resource name typically camel cased? i.e. MyComponent
Hi Scott,
I've been looking for other ressource names, and you're right, they're
camel cased. I'm correcting this right away.
36 matches
Mail list logo
