Actually, this is turning out to be a little tougher than it seemed at first
glance - because of SOAP.
It's easy to check for XML serialization to/from the entity engine because the
root element is always . It's easy to check for SOAP response
serialization because the root element is always .
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adrian Crum wrote:
> I'm working on the same concept here only with XML. I'm
> created an XML class that represents and XML object. If you
> want an XML string, you call XML.toString(). If you want a
> DOM object, you call XML.toDOM(). If you want to deserialize
> an object, y
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r908713 - in
> /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion:
> CollectionConverters.java test/MiscTests.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 10:26 PM
> Adrian Crum w
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Wed, 2/10/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subject: Re: svn commit: r908713 - in
>> /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/src/org/ofbiz/base/conversion:
>> CollectionConverters.java test/MiscTests.java
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 20
I agree. That's exactly what I did in my local copy. :-)
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, David E Jones wrote:
> From: David E Jones
> Subject: Re: XmlSerializer.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 7:58 PM
>
> We should at least keep the deserialization code aroun
We should at least keep the deserialization code around forever for backward
compatibility. You can select which deserializer to use based on the root
element or something, that shouldn't be tough.
-David
On Feb 13, 2010, at 8:53 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> I recently added the XStream library
I recently added the XStream library to the project - which enables
serializing/deserializing Java objects to XML or JSON.
With that addition, the XmlSerializer class is no longer needed. The XStream
library is more sophisticated and extensible than the home-grown code.
Switching XML serializer
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> If you agree that we shouldn't throw an exception, then
> I'll implement
> the code. I agree that the exception way sucks.
The only real cost of a detailed class/interface analysis is the first time an
unknown pair of classes request a converter. Once a
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: Conversion framework is not 'most specific' compatible
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 5:10 PM
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> From: Adam Heath
> >> Su
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subject: Re: Conversion framework is not 'most specific' compatible
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 4:58 PM
>> Adrian Crum wrote:
>>> --- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath
>> wrote:
>>>
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: Conversion framework is not 'most specific' compatible
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 4:58 PM
> Adrian Crum wrote:
> > --- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath
> wrote:
> >> From: Adam Heath
> >> Su
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Re: AbstractConverter not thread safe
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 4:56 PM
> Adam Heath wrote:
> > Object creation can't be synchronized. As such,
> any variable
> > assignments done in any ch
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> From: Adam Heath
>> Subject: Conversion framework is not 'most specific' compatible
>> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 1:09 PM
>> When Converters.getConverter doesn't
>> find an exact match for a
>> conv
Adam Heath wrote:
> Object creation can't be synchronized. As such, any variable
> assignments done in any chained constructors can be reordered at will
> by the VM. The only guarantee you have is that when the new call is
> finished, the object is constructed.
>
> AbstractConverter breaks this.
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> From: Adam Heath
> Subject: Conversion framework is not 'most specific' compatible
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 1:09 PM
> When Converters.getConverter doesn't
> find an exact match for a
> conversion request, it loops ove
Object creation can't be synchronized. As such, any variable
assignments done in any chained constructors can be reordered at will
by the VM. The only guarantee you have is that when the new call is
finished, the object is constructed.
AbstractConverter breaks this. In it's constructor, it regi
--- On Sat, 2/13/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> From: Scott Gray
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r909858 -
> /ofbiz/trunk/framework/entity/src/org/ofbiz/entity/test/EntityTestSuite.java
> To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
> Date: Saturday, February 13, 2010, 9:53 AM
>
> On 13/02/2010, at 10:45 AM, adri...@apache.or
Update (Edit) contact information throws missing screen error
-
Key: OFBIZ-3477
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3477
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Compon
When Converters.getConverter doesn't find an exact match for a
conversion request, it loops over all registered converts, and asks
then if they can handle it. However, this looping is not in any
particular order, as it is based on Map.values(), which is mostly random.
This means if there was a Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833451#action_12833451
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1803:
We should also consider that this button actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833450#action_12833450
]
BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-1803:
---
how would one get the url to bookmark when in the ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12833438#action_12833438
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1803:
Do we really need this link?
We could be
On 13/02/2010, at 10:45 AM, adri...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: adrianc
> Date: Sat Feb 13 17:45:11 2010
> New Revision: 909858
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=909858&view=rev
> Log:
> Test XStream serialization/deserialization of GenericValue.
>
> Modified:
>ofbiz/trunk/framework
Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Fri, 2/12/10, Adam Heath wrote:
>> It's also why I throw UnsupportedOperationException,
>> instead of
>> ConversionException, during convert(obj). You
>> shouldn't do doing
>> unknown conversions, when dealing with enums. In
>> those cases, you
>> should know that an
--- On Fri, 2/12/10, Adam Heath wrote:
> It's also why I throw UnsupportedOperationException,
> instead of
> ConversionException, during convert(obj). You
> shouldn't do doing
> unknown conversions, when dealing with enums. In
> those cases, you
> should know that an enum is being requested, and
25 matches
Mail list logo
