[VOTE] [RESULT] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

The vote has passed with the following result: binding +1 votes: 7 (Ashish Vijaywargiya, Adrian Crum, Bruno Busco, Bilgin Ibryam, Anil Patel, Jacques Le Roux, Jacopo Cappellato) non binding +1 votes: 4 (Michael Xu, BJ Freeman, Tim Ruppert, Sam Hamilton) binding -1 votes: 1 (Scott Gray) non bindin

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Jacques Le Roux wrote: > From: "james_sg" >> +1 >> >> For 2), may I suggest that the new run-install should print out a list of >> run-install-* variants and their explanations? > > There is already the traditionnal ant -p for all targets, but yes, why > not... Sorry, that brings us back to the

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 4.0

+1 On Apr 20, 2010, at 8:36 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to transform our release candidate 4.0 into an > official ASF release. > OFBiz 4.0 is an *old* release that will be archived (and removed from the ASF > mirrors) right after it will be released: we are doing this

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

From: "james_sg" +1 For 2), may I suggest that the new run-install should print out a list of run-install-* variants and their explanations? There is already the traditionnal ant -p for all targets, but yes, why not... Jacques Jacopo Cappellato-4 wrote: The easiest way to do this would

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

+1 For 2), may I suggest that the new run-install should print out a list of run-install-* variants and their explanations? Jacopo Cappellato-4 wrote: > > The easiest way to do this would be to: > 1) add run-install-demo (= run-install) > 2) run-install should simply print a message explaining

Re: Regarding SVN commit r892904

Just in case you weren't aware, JSR-275 was rejected last month: http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=275 Not that that means anything, just an FYI. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 22/04/2010, at 3:15 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: > Joda Time claims to fix the problems with the Ja

refactor SupplierProducts.agreements

supplierproducts links back to products which had product.agreement https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/ViewRelations?entityName=Product since it seems to me that the product.agreement should be used and the supplierproducts.agreements removed. a service to move the supplierproduct

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859936#action_12859936 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Adrian, sorry for the misunderstanding. I have ta

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3724) Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-3724. Resolution: Fixed > Copying WorkEffortCostCalc as part of a ProductionRun > ---

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859851#action_12859851 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3702: Chris, I'm not sure what your last comment means.

Re: Demo Server

Yes, but how to told them, they put them where they want in the (demo) server, and as they don't care (and have no ideas actually) they finish at root OK, please enough of that ;o) Jacques From: "BJ Freeman" if they are flied from users should they be in runtime/temp ===

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3737) XHTML Validation - Form Widget with type= list|multi and inner form renders bad markup with visible effects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737: - Description: The markup rendered for form widgets with inner fields are (this is

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3737) XHTML Validation - Form Widget with type= list|multi and inner form renders bad markup with visible effects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737: - Attachment: (was: OFBIZ-3737_widgetmulti_xhtml.diff) > XHTML Validation - For

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3737) XHTML Validation - Form Widget with type= list|multi and inner form renders bad markup with visible effects

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3737?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Blas Rodriguez Somoza updated OFBIZ-3737: - Attachment: OFBIZ-3737_widgetmulti_xhtml_v2.diff > XHTML Validation - Form Widget

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote: > >> ps: I think the 'run-' prefix is superfluous. ant install, ant >> install-demo seems better to me. > > Adam, > > I completely agree with you here... sometimes simplicity is in front of our > eyes and we don't see it:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859840#action_12859840 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Hi Adrian, My second example fieldLabelTooltip_DO_N

Re: Demo Server

if they are flied from users should they be in runtime/temp = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Sys

Re: Demo Server

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: None of those files are needed for Windows users. Most of those files look like artifacts that are left from bad commits. I think that Jacques was saying that the files have been created by users of the demo server d

Re: Demo Server

Thank you for the clarification. It looked to me like Scott was listing the contents of the repository. -Adrian Jacopo Cappellato wrote: On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: None of those files are needed for Windows users. Most of those files look like artifacts that are left fr

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859828#action_12859828 ] Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-3702: Chris, Internationalization of entity field descr

Re: Demo Server

From: "Adrian Crum" Jacques Le Roux wrote: Welcome Scott, Your help will be appreciated :o) Most of them are files saved by users using OFBiz. I left them there as they are harmless and maybe useful for those users, obviously some are using Windows ;o) None of those files are needed for Wi

Re: Demo Server

On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > > None of those files are needed for Windows users. Most of those files look > like artifacts that are left from bad commits. I think that Jacques was saying that the files have been created by users of the demo server during their experiments

Re: Demo Server

Jacques Le Roux wrote: Welcome Scott, Your help will be appreciated :o) Most of them are files saved by users using OFBiz. I left them there as they are harmless and maybe useful for those users, obviously some are using Windows ;o) None of those files are needed for Windows users. Most of t

Re: Lookups desccriptions

From: "Bilgin Ibryam" Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, At r933130 Bilgin introduced a nice feature which allows to show the related descriptions (if exist) of Ids used/rendered in lookups fields. There is also a showDescription lookup attribute to hide if needed. I wonder if we could not show the

Re: Demo Server

Welcome Scott, Your help will be appreciated :o) Most of them are files saved by users using OFBiz. I left them there as they are harmless and maybe useful for those users, obviously some are using Windows ;o) Not sure for selenium-server.jar As you certainly know I tuned startofbiz.sh I have

Re: Breadcrumb in wiki

No worries IMO as we have a workaround Thanks Jacques Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Yes, this is an open issue that I should be able to resolve hopefully today. BTW, I can also revert the changes I did to the two spaces until it is fixed. But if we could wait this would spare some of my time. K

Re: Lookups desccriptions

Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi, At r933130 Bilgin introduced a nice feature which allows to show the related descriptions (if exist) of Ids used/rendered in lookups fields. There is also a showDescription lookup attribute to hide if needed. I wonder if we could not show them by default (Bilgin set

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859740#action_12859740 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- i forgot to say ... fieldLabelTooltip_DO_NOT_COMMIT

Re: Breadcrumb in wiki

Yes, this is an open issue that I should be able to resolve hopefully today. BTW, I can also revert the changes I did to the two spaces until it is fixed. But if we could wait this would spare some of my time. Kind regards, Jacopo On Apr 22, 2010, at 10:13 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Hi Jacop

Breadcrumb in wiki

Hi Jacopo, I recenlty reported in the private ML some issues we have with the new wiki layout The layout is better now (wider etc...), Yes looks good, do you intend to generalize to all the wiki? even if there are still things to fix. I guess you mean the Add menu (missing for now), some

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chris snow updated OFBIZ-3702: -- Attachment: fieldLabelTooltip_DO_NOT_COMMIT.patch fieldLabelTooltip.png The patch field

Re: Demo Server

Thanks Jacques, Do you know what the extra files are in /home/ofbiz/trunk/ ? lekt...@ofbiz-vm:/home/ofbiz/trunk$ svn stat ? Demo Customer.vcf ? US.ALL.6656.catcs ? US.ALL.6693.catcs ? AllCatFeatures_US_3266.cfs ? serverhit ? US.35.attrxsl ? EBayDetails_US_2010_03

Re: Demo Server

Hi Scott, For the moment all is handled by hand, you will find all under home HTH Jacques From: "Scott Gray" This is mostly for Jacques and Hans, I have access to the demo server now and can start helping out as soon as I have time. Could one of you give me a run down on the layout of the

Re: What about renaming "run-install" to "run-install-demo"?

From: "Jacopo Cappellato" On Apr 21, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Adam Heath wrote: ps: I think the 'run-' prefix is superfluous. ant install, ant install-demo seems better to me. Adam, I completely agree with you here... sometimes simplicity is in front of our eyes and we don't see it: "install-demo