[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12862113#action_12862113 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3702: Thanks Chris, Your patch is in trunk at r

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3743) missing field description help

missing field description help -- Key: OFBIZ-3743 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3743 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: Release Candidate B

Re: Confluence error

Jacques, I am sorry but I do not think I will have the time to look at it now. We can switch to a simple tumbmails matrix. -Bruno 2010/4/28 Jacques Le Roux > Hi Bruno, > > Maybe we could have a look at the gallery plugin macro code? Does not look > like something hard to solve. What do you thi

Re: svn commit: r938844 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: example/config/ example/entitydef/ example/widget/example/ widget/config/ widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ widget/templates/

Done - comments added to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Could you please take care of Scott's remarks > > Thanks > > Jacques > > > Scott Gray wrote: > >> Inline >> >> Regard

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

That's because there is no web app mounted at the root by default. Tomcat needs a webapp in order to be able to do anything with a request. On a standard deployment you would just mount your ecommerce app as root or otherwise set up a redirect. This has nothing to do with broken pipes BTW. Re

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

OOTB do a http://localhost:8080/ this should generate a 404 error to the user. the page is blank. it does show the error in the access log. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

Like I said if the client closes the connection then it's impossible for us to send the error page. If it's reproducible OOTB then please provide the steps so I can take a look. Thanks Scott On 29/04/2010, at 2:32 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > I agree but if you run this in localhost the error that

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

I agree but if you run this in localhost the error that cause the broken pipes is from ofbiz. but at this point it is the fact the error.jsp does not show the error msg. a pointer where to look would be fine. I am sure once that gets fix I can proceed on my own. = BJ Freem

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

Broken pipes are not an OFBiz problem, the client has closed the connection so an exception is thrown when we try to send the response. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 29/04/2010, at 2:12 PM, BJ Freeman wrote: > this is on svn 930580 > > = > BJ

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

this is on svn 930580 = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat

Re: controlserverlet can not find the error.jsp

Ok next step the control finds the error.jsp but i get no output from it. the jsp code seems to be right <% String errorMsg = (String) request.getAttribute("_ERROR_MESSAGE_"); %> <%=UtilFormatOut.replaceString(errorMsg, "\n", "")%> except for this 2010-04-28 18:04:00,614 (TP-Processor3) [ ControlS

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

It was just a suggestion Hans nothing more. Take it, leave it, ignore it, whatever. I'm sorry to have exhausted you so. Regards Scott On 29/04/2010, at 1:18 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > we are talking here of adding an optional parameter to store a final end > reason of a customer request, why it

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

we are talking here of adding an optional parameter to store a final end reason of a customer request, why it was rejected cancelled etc. in total adding 4 lines of code. if you guys want to discuss this big, please go ahead...you want to revert it? please go ahead too and causing me to move this

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 28/04/2010, at 8:10 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over > t

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 On 28/04/2010 16:10, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over > time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for bug

Can Mutlitenancy handle different websites with / mount points through AJP

If the website entity is involved, but they are in different DB how was this designed. does the Default and/or tenantDB (not the tenants db) have to have a website entity with the delegator of each tenant website. = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Off

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861945#action_12861945 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Perhaps the solution would be to change the renderFi

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] chris snow updated OFBIZ-3702: -- Attachment: fieldTooltipHelp4.patch The attached patch (fieldTooltipHelp4.patch) addresses the concerns

Re: hailmerry checkout stats

You forgot to include the secret decoder ring. I have no clue what it says. -Adrian On 4/28/2010 1:42 PM, Adam Heath wrote: hailmerry-site:~# grep -h 'GET /checkout/start' /var/log/ofbiz/runtime/logs/access_log.2010-0{3-{19,2?,3?},4-??}|cut -f 1 -d ' '|sort -u|wc 98 981363 hailme

Re: hailmerry checkout stats

Adam Heath wrote: > hailmerry-site:~# grep -h 'GET /checkout/start' > /var/log/ofbiz/runtime/logs/access_log.2010-0{3-{19,2?,3?},4-??}|cut > -f 1 -d ' '|sort -u|wc > 98 981363 > hailmerry-site:~# grep -h 'GET /checkout/shipping' > /var/log/ofbiz/runtime/logs/access_log.2010-0{3-{19,2?

hailmerry checkout stats

hailmerry-site:~# grep -h 'GET /checkout/start' /var/log/ofbiz/runtime/logs/access_log.2010-0{3-{19,2?,3?},4-??}|cut -f 1 -d ' '|sort -u|wc 98 981363 hailmerry-site:~# grep -h 'GET /checkout/shipping' /var/log/ofbiz/runtime/logs/access_log.2010-0{3-{19,2?,3?},4-??}|cut -f 1 -d ' '|sor

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 - "BJ Freeman" wrote: > Data expands to fill the space available for storage. > A modern version is that no amount of computer automation will reduce > the size of a bureaucracy -- Ean Schuessler, CTO Brainfood.com e...@brainfood.com - http://www.brainfood.com - 214-720-0700 x 315

Promo items

The OFBiz promo code processes product quantities as singletons. If a large quantity of an item is added to the cart (ie. 2,000) and there is a promo for that product then the result is both a large quantity of promo adjustments as well as a long processing time for the cart. For some industries la

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

Data expands to fill the space available for storage. A modern version is that no amount of computer automation will reduce the size of a bureaucracy parkinson laws by Heathcote Parkinson Boy that dates me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parkinson%27s_Law = BJ Freeman http://

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Cheers, Ruppert On Apr 28, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over > time out of it: all the commits in thi

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

Scott Gray wrote: > On 28/04/2010, at 11:58 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> reason is a field on custRequest so i see no reason to call it >> CustRequestStatus. If you feel strong about this, change it. >> >> I have no time for this nitty gritty stuff. > > You really need to get a grip Hans, I wa

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 = BJ Freeman http://bjfreeman.elance.com Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com Systems Integrator-- Glad to Assist Chat Y! messenger: bjfr

Re: Around releases WAS: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:45 AM, David E Jones wrote: > >> >> +1 >> >> -David >> >> P.S. Quick, get your foot in the door! Throw in buggy stuff while you have a >> chance... you can commit bug fixes later but not new features. ;) >> >>

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 2010/4/28 Jacopo Cappellato > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created > over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for bug fixes > only, no n

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

David E Jones wrote: > +1 > > -David > > P.S. Quick, get your foot in the door! Throw in buggy stuff while you have a > chance... you can commit bug fixes later but not new features. ;) > > P.P.S. Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm becoming obsessed with looking at rule > systems and guessing at be

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

You must be thinking of a different community. We only commit high-quality code that has been thoroughly tested. -Adrian On 4/28/2010 1:45 AM, David E Jones wrote: +1 -David P.S. Quick, get your foot in the door! Throw in buggy stuff while you have a chance... you can commit bug fixes late

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 -Adrian On 4/28/2010 1:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Bob On 2010-04-28, at 4:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato > wrote: This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will b

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Thanks & Regards -- Pranay Pandey HotWax Media | www.hotwaxmedia.com On Apr 28, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Anil Patel wrote: +1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Apr 28, 2010, at 4:10 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will rep

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

On 28/04/2010, at 11:58 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > reason is a field on custRequest so i see no reason to call it > CustRequestStatus. If you feel strong about this, change it. > > I have no time for this nitty gritty stuff. You really need to get a grip Hans, I was simply suggesting a better

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

reason is a field on custRequest so i see no reason to call it CustRequestStatus. If you feel strong about this, change it. I have no time for this nitty gritty stuff. Regards, Hans On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:11 +1200, Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Hans, > > Wouldn't it be better to have a CustReque

Re: svn commit: r938817 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/order: script/org/ofbiz/order/request/CustRequestServices.xml servicedef/services_request.xml

Hi Hans, Wouldn't it be better to have a CustRequestStatus.reason field for this? Using CustRequest.reason doesn't seem right for this situation. Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 28/04/2010, at 8:36 PM, hans...@apache.org wrote: > Author: hansbak > Date: Wed Apr 28 08

[jira] Reopened: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Gray reopened OFBIZ-3702: --- http://markmail.org/message/xpbtj6oxnnwaqplv > provide better user help > > >

Re: svn commit: r938844 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: example/config/ example/entitydef/ example/widget/example/ widget/config/ widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ widget/templates/

Hi Chris, Could you please take care of Scott's remarks Thanks Jacques Scott Gray wrote: Inline Regards Scott On 28/04/2010, at 10:02 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote: Author: jleroux Date: Wed Apr 28 10:02:57 2010 New Revision: 938844 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=938844&view=rev Lo

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861758#action_12861758 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3702: It would be very good indeed. > provide b

Re: svn commit: r938844 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework: example/config/ example/entitydef/ example/widget/example/ widget/config/ widget/src/org/ofbiz/widget/form/ widget/templates/

Inline Regards Scott On 28/04/2010, at 10:02 PM, jler...@apache.org wrote: > Author: jleroux > Date: Wed Apr 28 10:02:57 2010 > New Revision: 938844 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=938844&view=rev > Log: > A slightly modified patch from Chris Snow "Provide better user help" > (https:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12861753#action_12861753 ] chris snow commented on OFBIZ-3702: --- Thanks Jacques! In my spare time, I now have the bi

Re: Release branch 10.04 will be created on Friday 30/04

Done at r938844 Thanks Chris Jacques From: "Chris Snow" I would like to get the following in (if someone would be happy to commit it): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 - fieldTooltipHelp3.patch Many thanks, Chris This is just a reminder that I am going to create the new r

[jira] Closed: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3702. -- Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Resolution: Fixed Thanks Chris, Your (slightly modified ) patc

[jira] Assigned: (OFBIZ-3702) provide better user help

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux reassigned OFBIZ-3702: -- Assignee: Jacques Le Roux > provide better user help > > >

Re: End of month : Main New features

Or... are there any volunteers (outside of the committers group) that would be willing to help (monitor the commit logs, prepare summaries of main changes, keep the page updated)? This could be a good first step in the direction of becoming a committer. Kind regards, Jacopo On Apr 28, 2010, a

End of month : Main New features

Please devs, don't forget to add your changes in Main New features with shorts explanations https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Main+New+Features Thanks Jacques

R: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Marco >Messaggio originale >Da: jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com >Data: 28/04/2010 10.10 >A: >Ogg: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04" > >This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". >This branch will repr

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 -- Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:10 +0200, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet

Around releases WAS: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

On Apr 28, 2010, at 10:45 AM, David E Jones wrote: > > +1 > > -David > > P.S. Quick, get your foot in the door! Throw in buggy stuff while you have a > chance... you can commit bug fixes later but not new features. ;) > > P.P.S. Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm becoming obsessed with looking at

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Jacques From: "Jacopo Cappellato" This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for bug fixes only, no n

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 -David P.S. Quick, get your foot in the door! Throw in buggy stuff while you have a chance... you can commit bug fixes later but not new features. ;) P.P.S. Sorry, I couldn't resist. I'm becoming obsessed with looking at rule systems and guessing at behavior people will use to game the sys

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

++1 Le mercredi 28 avril 2010 à 10:10 +0200, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) > named "release10.04". > This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over > time out of it: all the commits in this

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for bug fixes only, no

Re: [VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

+1 -- Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. http://www.hotwaxmedia.com USA | Italy | New Zealand | India Jacopo Cappellato wrote: This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and relea

[VOTE] [BRANCH] Creation of the Release Branch "release10.04"

This is the vote thread to create a new release branch (not a release yet) named "release10.04". This branch will represent a feature freeze and releases will be created over time out of it: all the commits in this branch will be for bug fixes only, no new features. Vote: [ +1] create the bra

Re: Release branch 10.04 will be created on Friday 30/04

I would like to get the following in (if someone would be happy to commit it): https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3702 - fieldTooltipHelp3.patch Many thanks, Chris > This is just a reminder that I am going to create the new release branch > ("release10.04") in Friday this week and it w

Re: Release branch 10.04 will be created on Friday 30/04

Should we vote also for the creation of the branch? This is probably a good idea, yes. Ok, I am going to start a vote right now, if the vote will pass I will cut the release branch in the week-end. Thank you Scott, Jacopo On Apr 28, 2010, at 9:54 AM, Scott Gray wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > Haven'

Re: Release branch 10.04 will be created on Friday 30/04

Hi Jacopo, Haven't we always voted on these in the past? Regards Scott On 28/04/2010, at 7:47 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > This is just a reminder that I am going to create the new release branch > ("release10.04") in Friday this week and it will represent the features > freeze for all the

Release branch 10.04 will be created on Friday 30/04

This is just a reminder that I am going to create the new release branch ("release10.04") in Friday this week and it will represent the features freeze for all the releases that will be issued out of this branch: after Friday only bug fixes will be committed to that branch. If there is somethin

Re: svn commit: r938074 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/base/lib/j2eespecs: tomcat-6.0.16-annotations_spec.jar tomcat-6.0.16-el_2.1_spec.jar tomcat-6.0.16-jsp_2.1_spec.jar tomcat-6.0.16-servlet_2.5_spec.j

Hi Erwan, I have noticed that you have left the jar: framework/catalina/lib/tomcat-6.0.16-tomcat-juli-adapters.jar Is it something we should remove? Jacopo On Apr 26, 2010, at 4:54 PM, er...@apache.org wrote: > Author: erwan > Date: Mon Apr 26 14:54:17 2010 > New Revision: 938074 > > URL: ht

Re: Confluence error

Hi Bruno, Maybe we could have a look at the gallery plugin macro code? Does not look like something hard to solve. What do you think? Thanks Jacques From: "Jacques Le Roux" Thanks Don, I will do so Jacques From: "Don Brown" Yes, this looks to be a bug in the gallery plugin that ships

Re: Confluence error

Thanks Don, I will do so Jacques From: "Don Brown" Yes, this looks to be a bug in the gallery plugin that ships with Confluence. You can file a bug in the Confluence project (recommended) and optionally file a bug in the actual plugin project: https://studio.plugins.atlassian.com/browse/ADVM