hi Scott,
Thanks.
We are customizing ofbiz for a customer here in China. Party, Order,
Agreement, AP/AR, Birt, Catalog are in the current scope and we feel very
comfortable with the flexibility offered by ofbiz. Now customer needs CMS.
However, current CMS component is not that ready in ofbiz.
BJ,
the existing data model (as it is described in the Data Model Resource Book as
you have mentioned previously) already takes care of this and I am not planning
to change this.
My proposal was related to the agreements picked for an order.
Jacopo
On Jul 8, 2010, at 12:59 AM, BJ Freeman
Scott, Adam, BJ,
thanks for your feedback.
Based on your comments we will probably need also an AgreementOrderApplPurpose
(or Type) entity so that we could have an agreement that governs the terms and
prices applied to a customer, the commissions due to a sales rep etc... (unless
we just rely
Hi Michael,
Personally, I wouldn't do anymore than the most basic CMS work with the
existing OFBiz component, but maybe I'm biased because I want to see it
replaced :-)
In regards to working together, my spare time is pretty limited so I doubt that
I'll be working very fast and probably
hi Scott,
Ok, no problem. Will discuss further internally first and then decide where
to go ...
--
Regards,
Michael Xu (xudong)
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
Hi Michael,
Personally, I wouldn't do anymore than the most basic CMS work with the
The context setting should override the widget.properties setting, that is the
only reason why we have a context version of the setting.
Please respond to this one, you haven't responded to the discussion regarding
your last commit yet.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
I agree with what the description of the code says at the top.
your setting makes that the widget.verbose by default is false and the
messages are not shown.
Regards,
Hans
P.S. i missed the last comments, which one?
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 21:54 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
The context setting
perhaps some more qualification: The context does override but only in
the case when the properties file is false.
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 17:13 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote:
I agree with what the description of the code says at the top.
your setting makes that the widget.verbose by default is
Okay that should work, sorry, I only read the commit message but didn't go and
look at the code.
I think ideally the context setting would be null always unless an override
should take place and in when it is set then the widget.properties setting
should be ignored. But the situation you've
Exception on Add Credit Card page from Quick Checkout option
-
Key: OFBIZ-3850
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3850
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mukesh Manohar Marathe updated OFBIZ-3850:
--
Attachment: OFBIZ-3850.patch
Here is the required patch for this issue.
Then you should change the description, not the code. The intended behavior is:
The properties setting is the default, it can be overridden in the web.xml file
(application-wide setting), or in the context (screen-specific setting).
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Hans Bakker
My spare time is very limited too, but I would be willing to help.
-Adrian
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Subject: Re: Hippo CMS
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 12:04 AM
Hi Michael,
Okay well cool, I'll go ahead and create a branch at some point, I know Sascha
has expressed interest as well so we may as well get the ball rolling.
Regards
Scott
On 8/07/2010, at 11:54 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
My spare time is very limited too, but I would be willing to help.
-Adrian
please check the code before you comment?
i changed it because the comments were not shown by default anymore as
was originally.
If you go that far , i will go so far and will use my veto and revert
the code that added this context stuff? 'true' in the properties file
should always show the
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote:
please check the code before you
comment?
I did.
i changed it because the comments were not shown by default
anymore as
was originally.
Give an example please. As far as I can tell, the comments worked exactly as
they
Hi Hans,
Two points:
1. Calm down, this is just a discussion. Telling Adrian to look at the code
is perfectly valid, getting mad and making threats is not
2. You're not the first to mention it but I don't know where this idea of a
veto came from, it doesn't exist. When required, the PMC as
Ok Scott asked me to reply.
i do not have the time and even the knowledge to fix this.
i opted to revert to 'double' here what was the quickest, however i
agree not the perfect solution.
Regards,
Hans
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:37 +1200, Scott Gray wrote:
If there is a risk of rounding errors
please open a Jira with steps to create error.
maybe someone that has time will fix it.
so I suggest revert in svn change it in your local copy.
Hans Bakker sent the following on 7/8/2010 5:28 AM:
Ok Scott asked me to reply.
i do not have the time and even the knowledge to fix this.
i opted
Yes the datamodel that I referenced for partyrelationships is in Ofbiz.
However there is no supporting code that creates a partyreleationship
between the Company and Party with role of customer and
partyrelationshiptype of Customer.(CUSTOMER_REL)
So the queries I mentions will not return a list
in testing my code from 9.04 to 10.4 I see createcustomer in the
ecommerce has be replaced by QuickCreateCustomer.
since the only difference is you can create a customer with just name.
I would like to propose that it call a createCustomer after it created
the entity. have the createCustomer
Ok this is what happened:
I upgraded ofbiz from about 3-4 weeks ago. Some time ago i created a new
component in hot deploy using the web.xml from the example component. I
see the widget comments are not generated. I check widget.properties and
see the parameter is set to true. I used this feature
+1
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 19:22 -0700, BJ Freeman wrote:
in testing my code from 9.04 to 10.4 I see createcustomer in the
ecommerce has be replaced by QuickCreateCustomer.
since the only difference is you can create a customer with just name.
I would like to propose that it call a
Hans,
It's good that you took the time to understand the problem.
What would be acceptable is to revert the changes you made so the original
behavior is restored. Your first commit tried to fix something that wasn't
broken, and your second commit disables a demonstration of how the widget
Adrian,
what i proposed to you was a compromise. You seem to only accept your
way, as happened many times in the past.
therefore i am not in for compromises any more. I would like you to
remove the context code which enables the override in the web.xml. It
makes the system unnecessarily
Hans,
There was no need for a compromise because there was no problem to begin with.
You just admitted the problem you were experiencing was due to a
misconfiguration in your local copy. Your solution to that misconfiguration was
to change the trunk. The trunk was not the problem - the problem
Adrian,
I hate to say it, but it seems like these messages from Hans are presenting the
issue and attempting to initiate a discussion on the best way to go forward,
and your messages are not discussing the issue and instead appealing to some
sort of reason to not change how things are at all.
David E Jones wrote:
Adrian,
I hate to say it, but it seems like these messages from Hans are presenting
the issue and attempting to initiate a discussion on the best way to go
forward, and your messages are not discussing the issue and instead appealing
to some sort of reason to not
David,
You are missing the point - there was no issue. The code worked fine.
I *have* addressed the issue. The correct behavior as designed was detailed in
my first reply. If anyone needs further information they can check the commit
logs and the related Jira issue.
Hans had a misconfigured
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
David E Jones wrote:
Adrian,
I hate to say it, but it seems like these messages
from Hans are presenting the issue and attempting to
initiate a discussion on the best way to go forward, and
your messages are not discussing the
Just because you are fine with how it works doesn't mean others are fine with
it, which is usually the reason a discussion starts and discovering such
differences and exploring possible resolutions is the point of discussions.
For my part, getting back to the issue, I also noticed that the
31 matches
Mail list logo
