Thanks Ashish.
Regards,
-- Vivek Mishra
On Saturday 31 July 2010 03:21 PM, ash...@apache.org wrote:
Author: ashish
Date: Sat Jul 31 09:51:16 2010
New Revision: 981026
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981026&view=rev
Log:
Applied fix from trunk for revision: 981025
When we pass fractional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rene Scheibe updated OFBIZ-3744:
Attachment: selectall.js.patch
fixed issue
- css.style.visible cannot be true/false as used so in c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-3744.
--
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Fix Version/s: Release Branch 09.04
Releas
Scott,
Are you sure this does what you intended? The parameters are being assigned the
service's description, not the parameter's description.
-Adrian
--- On Sat, 7/31/10, lekt...@apache.org wrote:
> From: lekt...@apache.org
> Subject: svn commit: r981018 - in /ofbiz/trunk/framework/service:
Scott,
I fixed the code and built it out a little.
This is a good idea, but I have a couple of problems with it:
1. User-oriented meta-data should be kept in properties files - so it can be
internationalized. The drawback to that is, developers will be less likely to
include descriptions if th
Yeah whoops, thanks for fixing that up.
Inline
Regards
Scott
On 1/08/2010, at 3:55 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> Scott,
>
> I fixed the code and built it out a little.
>
> This is a good idea, but I have a couple of problems with it:
>
> 1. User-oriented meta-data should be kept in properties fil
--- On Sat, 7/31/10, Scott Gray wrote:
> Yeah whoops, thanks for fixing that
> up.
>
> Inline
>
> Regards
> Scott
>
> On 1/08/2010, at 3:55 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>
> > Scott,
> >
> > I fixed the code and built it out a little.
> >
> > This is a good idea, but I have a couple of problems
> w
On 1/08/2010, at 11:24 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> --- On Sat, 7/31/10, Scott Gray wrote:
>> Yeah whoops, thanks for fixing that
>> up.
>>
>> Inline
>>
>> Regards
>> Scott
>>
>> On 1/08/2010, at 3:55 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> Scott,
>>>
>>> I fixed the code and built it out a little.
>>>
>
I wonder if before we do a formal release we shouldn't perhaps take another
look at our release naming convention of {year}.{month}?
Do people find it useful? Does it cause any confusion?
To be honest I don't really like it and would prefer to just have OFBiz 10,
OFBiz 11, etc. I don't feel s
I like it, thanks Adam.
Regards
Scott
On 1/08/2010, at 6:32 AM, doo...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: doogie
> Date: Sat Jul 31 18:32:16 2010
> New Revision: 981077
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=981077&view=rev
> Log:
> New merge script.
>
> Modified:
>ofbiz/branches/release10.04/
Scott Gray wrote:
> I like it, thanks Adam.
It'd be nice if the logic was added to the .bat version too. I don't
have a windows install available to test with.
On 1/08/2010, at 3:28 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
> Scott Gray wrote:
>> I like it, thanks Adam.
>
> It'd be nice if the logic was added to the .bat version too. I don't
> have a windows install available to test with.
Can't help you there, sorry.
BTW did you notice my commit message didn't come th
12 matches
Mail list logo
