[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3963) In the weblogic server application deployment in tempfiles unsuccessful, leading to the path of generated image can not find the verification code

In the weblogic server application deployment in tempfiles unsuccessful, leading to the path of generated image can not find the verification code --

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3962) In IE under, myportal module, registration, when only refreshes the verification code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916053#action_12916053 ] Wang Suozhu commented on OFBIZ-3962: I was so resolved When submitted to add a time p

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3962) In IE under, myportal module, registration, when only refreshes the verification code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wang Suozhu updated OFBIZ-3962: --- Attachment: screenshot-1.jpg > In IE under, myportal module, registration, when only refreshes the >

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3962) In IE under, myportal module, registration, when only refreshes the verification code

In IE under, myportal module, registration, when only refreshes the verification code - Key: OFBIZ-3962 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3962 Project:

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3961) Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently override each other

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916047#action_12916047 ] Wickersheimer Jeremy commented on OFBIZ-3961: - I just saw you have a similar fi

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3961) Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently override each other

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12916016#action_12916016 ] Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-3961: --- Hi Jeremy, I thought I had already fixed this, have

Re: svn commit: r1001368 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/data: DemoBlogEntryData.xml DemoBlogMiscData.xml

Apologize since hans did ./ant clean-all and that does deletes the derby, I thought you meant something else. = BJ Freeman Strategic Power Office with Supplier Automation Specialtymarket.com

[jira] Created: (OFBIZ-3961) Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently override each other

Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently override each other Key: OFBIZ-3961 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3961 Project: OFBiz Issue Type

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3961) Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently override each other

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wickersheimer Jeremy updated OFBIZ-3961: Attachment: OFBIZ-3961.patch > Unnamed events in controller processor maps silently

Re: svn commit: r1001368 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/data: DemoBlogEntryData.xml DemoBlogMiscData.xml

Hi BJ, I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. All I was saying to Hans was that if he isn't using a derby database to check against then ant clean-all may not expose the problem because it requires an empty database to reproduce. Regards Scott On 29/09/2010, at 4:30 PM, BJ Free

Re: svn commit: r1001368 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/data: DemoBlogEntryData.xml DemoBlogMiscData.xml

I remember when I made similar comments long time ago was told that only guarantee derby and ./ant clean-all interesting to see the reverse. Scott Gray sent the following on 9/28/2010 7:25 PM: Hi Hans, Thanks for looking into and yes, it is just a straight clean-all and then run-install.

Re: svn commit: r1001368 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/data: DemoBlogEntryData.xml DemoBlogMiscData.xml

Hi Hans, Thanks for looking into and yes, it is just a straight clean-all and then run-install. You can see here that buildbot is reporting the same problem as me: http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/582/steps/compile/logs/stdio That's the output from buildbot's latest run-install

Re: svn commit: r1001368 - in /ofbiz/trunk/applications/content/data: DemoBlogEntryData.xml DemoBlogMiscData.xml

Hi Scott, thank you for the attention you have to my commits, however can you explain what you did? I did here, ./ant clean-all;./ant run-install and here you have the last few lines of the log: [java] 2010-09-28 19:04:36,659 (main) [EntityDataLoadContainer.java:396:INFO ] 4 of 15452 fr

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3960) Aritfact shows up missing widgets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] BJ Freeman updated OFBIZ-3960: -- Description: running the Artifact then looking at the log it show missing widgets. Not sure yet if that

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3960) Aritfact shows up missing widgets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915875#action_12915875 ] BJ Freeman commented on OFBIZ-3960: --- sorry about that clicked on the demo-stable instead

Re: ofbizify - ofbiz gwt integration

Hi All, I have updated the API and made some improvements. Also there is an example component available with seed data, which will run OOTB. Getting started : http://code.google.com/p/ofbizify/wiki/GettingStarted Developers : http://code.google.com/p/ofbizify/wiki/DevelopersGuide The developers

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-1425) Improve the ModelField.getDescription method

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915701#action_12915701 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1425: I did not look into details but this sound

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3846) Calendar issue in EditCategoryProducts screen

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915696#action_12915696 ] Atul Vani commented on OFBIZ-3846: -- the same issue is here too https://issues.apache.org/j

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3960) Aritfact shows up missing widgets

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915675#action_12915675 ] Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-3960: I wonder about the version you used becaus

Re: svn commit: r1002044 - in /ofbiz/branches/jquery: ./ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/ledger/ applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/ applications/party/webapp/party

Far be it from me to get in the way of your work Jacques. Scott On 28/09/2010, at 9:45 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Sorry to disturb you but we are using it and someone is working on the > accounting component currently. > > Jacques > > Scott Gray wrote: >> I hate to be the guy that's always

Re: svn commit: r1002044 - in /ofbiz/branches/jquery: ./ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/ledger/ applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/ applications/party/webapp/party

Sorry to disturb you but we are using it and someone is working on the accounting component currently. Jacques Scott Gray wrote: I hate to be the guy that's always complaining about stuff, but do you really need to keep this branch level with the trunk every single day? I have a hard time ke

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3957) Seems like there is an issue with <@htmlTemplate.renderDateTimeField in FTL

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915669#action_12915669 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3957: yes that is right. The ftl macro definiti

[jira] Commented: (OFBIZ-3917) Auto-complete for dropdowns (it's currently in selectall.js)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12915668#action_12915668 ] Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-3917: Well done guys, thanks for you're help! Sa

[jira] Updated: (OFBIZ-3919) Order Application Mirgrated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sascha Rodekamp updated OFBIZ-3919: --- Attachment: OFBIZ-3919_OrderApplicationNewAddressLookup.patch Hi, here is the fix for the add

Re: svn commit: r1002044 - in /ofbiz/branches/jquery: ./ applications/accounting/script/org/ofbiz/accounting/ledger/ applications/order/script/org/ofbiz/order/customer/ applications/party/webapp/party

I hate to be the guy that's always complaining about stuff, but do you really need to keep this branch level with the trunk every single day? I have a hard time keeping up with all of the commit messages and virtually doubling their number certainly doesn't make things any easier. On a side ra

Re: entity engine - separation of concerns

On 28/09/2010, at 8:04 PM, chris snow wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Sorry for being a bit vague with my initial response. > > The last few nights I have been working on separating the entity > engine so it could be used outside of ofbiz, but it is proving to be > very difficult due to the entity engine

Re: entity engine - separation of concerns

It's irrelevant to discuss who has the final say before everything has been said. And please keep in mind that I haven't actually spoken out against the proposal, I've only attempted to get its proponents to do a better job of justifying it. I can't tell you what would be a waste of your time

Re: buildbot failure in ASF Buildbot on ofbiz-trunk

Thanks Anil! Jacques From: "Anil Patel" My most recent fix in services also fixed failing test. We should be good now. Thanks and Regards Anil Patel HotWax Media Inc Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz" On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Anil Patel wrote: I see it

Re: entity engine - separation of concerns

There's obviously two camps on the proposals, so who gets the overall say in what changes make it into the framework? I.e. Would I be wasting my time working on separating ModelEntity and ModelReader (and entity engine core functionality from its configuration)?

Re: entity engine - separation of concerns

Hi Scott, Sorry for being a bit vague with my initial response. The last few nights I have been working on separating the entity engine so it could be used outside of ofbiz, but it is proving to be very difficult due to the entity engine's dependency (coupling) on the ofbiz configuration code. S