On 5/13/2011 2:33 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13033421#comment-13033421
]
Leon commented on OFBIZ-4281:
-
hi, Sascha,
here is an example:
in form widget, we defined a l
On May 13, 2011, at 2:21 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>> On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones w
On 5/13/2011 2:07 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestP
As long as it is just for the test-containers.xml file.
I would be against changing this for the ofbiz-containers.xml file, too many
people are used to it and too much documentation points to it, so changing it
there would require a significant effort to change docs and communicate the
differe
On May 13, 2011, at 2:02 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>> On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> The CustRequestParty entity seems to
On 5/13/2011 1:53 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
Type entity in The Data Model R
On May 13, 2011, at 1:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
>> On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
>>
>>> The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request
>>> Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name
On 5/13/2011 1:36 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name difference, the
only other difference is using Role Type inste
On May 13, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
> The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request Role
> Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name difference, the
> only other difference is using Role Type instead of Request Role Type.
> Reusing Rol
The CustRequestParty entity seems to be an implementation of the Request
Role Type entity in The Data Model Resource Book. Besides the name
difference, the only other difference is using Role Type instead of
Request Role Type. Reusing Role Type in this way is okay from my
perspective. The probl
+1, I can't see any issues changing default OOTB
Jacques
From: "Erwan de FERRIERES"
Hi all,
I'm planning on changing the ports for the http and https test
containers. This way, tests can be runned on the Apache jenkins instance
(8080 is already used).
Is there anyone against these ?
Chee
Hi all,
I'm planning on changing the ports for the http and https test
containers. This way, tests can be runned on the Apache jenkins instance
(8080 is already used).
Is there anyone against these ?
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032976#comment-13032976
]
Scott Gray commented on OFBIZ-4278:
---
I don't see a reason why it doesn't and the commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13032942#comment-13032942
]
Sascha Rodekamp commented on OFBIZ-4281:
Hey Leon can you give me an example looku
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp reassigned OFBIZ-4281:
--
Assignee: Sascha Rodekamp
> parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if the
parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if there's slash '/' in
data
-
Key: OFBIZ-4281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Leon updated OFBIZ-4281:
Attachment: fieldlookup.js.patch
> parse javascript link wrongly in lookup layer dialog if there's slash '/' in
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4256.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: SVN trunk
The Patch is in Rev: 1102615
Have a good day
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sascha Rodekamp closed OFBIZ-4275.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Hi Erwan,
sorry for the delay. I submitted the new functionality @rev 1102597
20 matches
Mail list logo