[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacques Le Roux updated OFBIZ-5720:
---
Affects Version/s: Trunk
Trunk is concerned as well
> When click the "Go Back" button, the s
Pierre Smits created OFBIZ-5721:
---
Summary: Generate pdf doesn't open in new target
Key: OFBIZ-5721
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5721
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz
11.04.05".
Apache OFBiz is an open source enterprise automation software project (ERP,
CRM, E-Business / E-Commerce, MRP, SCM, CMMS/EAM...):
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 11.04.05" is a bug fix release for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pierre Smits updated OFBIZ-5721:
Attachment: OFBiz-5721-ecommerce-PDFnewTarget.patch
This patch fixes the issue.
> Generate pdf doe
The Apache OFBiz community is pleased to announce the new release "Apache OFBiz
12.04.04".
Apache OFBiz is an open source enterprise automation software project (ERP,
CRM, E-Business / E-Commerce, MRP, SCM, CMMS/EAM...):
http://ofbiz.apache.org/
"Apache OFBiz 12.04.04" is a bug fix release for
CVE-2014-0232: Apache OFBiz Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability
Severity: Important
Vendor:
The Apache Software Foundation
Versions Affected:
Apache OFBiz 11.04.01 to 11.04.04
Apache OFBiz 12.04.01 to 11.04.03
The unsupported Apache OFBiz 09.04.x, 10.04.x versions may be also affected
Des
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102004#comment-14102004
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5287:
--
in order to simplify testing, wouldn'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102021#comment-14102021
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5287:
Yes, please commit. The upgrade is needed, your p
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk while building
ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/211
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: forced: by IRC user on chan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102054#comment-14102054
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5287:
I agree, after all trunk is bleeding edge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102055#comment-14102055
]
Sumit Pandit commented on OFBIZ-5720:
-
Hi Jacques! It is because "ajaxUpdateEvent" exi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102062#comment-14102062
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5287:
-
Before releasing it to trunk (and inclusion int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102078#comment-14102078
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5720:
Thanks Summit,
[~gavinju] with that in h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102082#comment-14102082
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5287:
[~pfm.smits] Sure it should; maybe you co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102097#comment-14102097
]
Pierre Smits commented on OFBIZ-5287:
-
If I had the time available to delve into the n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102096#comment-14102096
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5287:
--
Thanks for all your feedback! I am go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14102108#comment-14102108
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5287:
--
Committed to trunk with rev. 1618831.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-5287.
Resolution: Fixed
> Migrating from Log4j 1.2.17 to log4j2
> ---
The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder ofbiz-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk/builds/212
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu
Build Reason: scheduler
Build Source S
Thanks Jacopo!
No more missing log entries due to logger overflows!
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/19/2014 11:36 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Tue Aug 19 10:36:01 2014
New Revision: 1618831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1618831
Log:
OFBIZ-52
This is great news! Thank you Adrian
Jacopo
On Aug 19, 2014, at 1:35 PM, Adrian Crum
wrote:
> Thanks Jacopo!
>
> No more missing log entries due to logger overflows!
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sandglass Software
> www.sandglass-software.com
>
> On 8/19/2014 11:36 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
>> Aut
Before I start the process of preparing the release files for the first release
of the 13.07 series and call a vote on it I would like to get your feedback on
a couple of topics.
Should we backport to it the recent switch to Java 7?
Should we backport to it the recent update to Log4j2?
The main
Good news, thanks for feedback Adrian
Jacques
Le 19/08/2014 13:35, Adrian Crum a écrit :
Thanks Jacopo!
No more missing log entries due to logger overflows!
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/19/2014 11:36 AM, jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jacopoc
Date: Tue A
I don't have an opinion on this.
The "rule" has been to keep backports restricted to bug fixes only, but
we have a history of backporting various refactorings to make branch
maintenance easier.
From my perspective, the two things cancel each other out, and I end up
with no opinion.
Adrian
Java 6 is already 8 years old. Java 7 is 3 years old. Java 8 is pretty
new but worth considering if it is not a significant different from the
upgrade to Java 7.
How much work was involved in the switch from 6 to 7.
The difference between versions of Log4j would not seem to be a big
advantage
Inline...
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/19/2014 3:45 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Java 6 is already 8 years old. Java 7 is 3 years old. Java 8 is pretty
new but worth considering if it is not a significant different from the
upgrade to Java 7.
How much work was invol
I'm using trunk for a development and there are no issues with Java7, so IMO we
can backport yes
We could wait a bit (few weeks?) for log4j2, there is no hurry to release I
guess?
Jacques
Le 19/08/2014 16:16, Adrian Crum a écrit :
I don't have an opinion on this.
The "rule" has been to keep
On 19/08/2014 10:59 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Inline...
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/19/2014 3:45 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Java 6 is already 8 years old. Java 7 is 3 years old. Java 8 is pretty
new but worth considering if it is not a significant different from the
Le 19/08/2014 18:27, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 19/08/2014 10:59 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Inline...
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/19/2014 3:45 PM, Ron Wheeler wrote:
Java 6 is already 8 years old. Java 7 is 3 years old. Java 8 is pretty
new but worth considering
As far as we can tell we don't know how many do run OFBiz from the
unreleased 13.x branch, as we don't have anhy download metrics.
If the release manager of r13.07.01 (Jacopo) feels confident that the risk
of incorporating Java 7 and Log4J2 is minimal, then I would say go ahead.
>From a marketing
Am 19.08.2014 15:34, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
> Before I start the process of preparing the release files for the first
> release of the 13.07 series and call a vote on it I would like to get your
> feedback on a couple of topics.
>
> Should we backport to it the recent switch to Java 7?
What
Good points.
As a new person, I am still learning about the community and how it works.
Ron
On 19/08/2014 4:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Le 19/08/2014 18:27, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
On 19/08/2014 10:59 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Inline...
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.co
Both the additions are good. I must say we can go ahead and provide support
of Java 7 and Log4j2 in Release 13.07.
>> True, that shouldn't affect those considering OFBiz. But sys admins
configure tools to analyze OFBiz logs, and the new format could break those
tools. Keep in mind there may be >>
Le 19/08/2014 23:36, Christian Geisert a écrit :
Am 19.08.2014 15:34, schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
Before I start the process of preparing the release files for the first release
of the 13.07 series and call a vote on it I would like to get your feedback on
a couple of topics.
Should we backpor
34 matches
Mail list logo
