RE: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 Thanks & Regards, Swapnil -Original Message- From: Jacopo Cappellato [mailto:jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 12:22 AM To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01 This is the vote thread to issue the first release from

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 Best regards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name of the new release

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 - Best Regards, Swapnil M Mane On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz 16.11.01". > > The

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 -- Thanks & Regards --- Arun Patidar Manager,Enterprise Software Development HotWax Mediawww.hotwaxsystems.com On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Michael Brohl wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > > Michael > > Am 21.11.16 um 19:51 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: > > This is the

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 -- Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Systems - est. 1997 On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name of the new release will be

Re: svn commit: r1770539 - /ofbiz/trunk/build.gradle

Hi Taher, >If you want to always use the library for your development by declaring >compileOnly or testCompileOnly then my alternative suggestion is to > actually modify our build script to include by default all the dependency >types declared in here -> https://docs.gradle.org/ >

Re: svn commit: r1770539 - /ofbiz/trunk/build.gradle

Hi Jacques, compileOnly is used only in the add-on modules but because of the way the plugin framework is setup/designed you can’t directly use the “compileOnly” feature in the build.gradle file of the module. It evaluates to an error if its being used directly. Two ways I see how this can be

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 Thanks, Michael Am 21.11.16 um 19:51 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch "release16.11". The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz 16.11.01". The release files can be downloaded from here:

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 On 22 November 2016 at 05:51, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz 16.11.01". > > The release files can be downloaded from

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 On 22 November 2016 at 09:44, Nicolas Malin wrote: > md5sum ok, shasum ok and the ./gradle loadDefault testIntegration return > SUCCESSFUL > > So +1 for me > > Nicolas > > > Le 21/11/2016 à 19:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : > >> This is the vote thread to issue the

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

md5sum ok, shasum ok and the ./gradle loadDefault testIntegration return SUCCESSFUL So +1 for me Nicolas Le 21/11/2016 à 19:51, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch "release16.11". The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 12:23 AM, Taher Alkhateeb slidingfilame...@gmail.com wrote: +1 On Nov 21, 2016 9:51 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name

Re: [VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

+1 On Nov 21, 2016 9:51 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch > "release16.11". > > The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz 16.11.01". > > The release files can be downloaded from here:

[VOTE] [RELEASE] Apache OFBiz 16.11.01

This is the vote thread to issue the first release from the branch "release16.11". The name of the new release will be "Apache OFBiz 16.11.01". The release files can be downloaded from here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ofbiz/ and are: * apache-ofbiz-16.11.01.zip: the actual release

Re: Creating a new release branch in preparation for the new release

Yeah I'd also rather release after the massive changes we applied to have something new for our adopters to start using. On Nov 21, 2016 9:22 PM, "Jacopo Cappellato" < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux < > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>

Re: Creating a new release branch in preparation for the new release

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 7:17 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > BTW we should try to release more often than once a year +1 Jacopo

Re: Creating a new release branch in preparation for the new release

Right Sharan, I also agree, I can't think at anything crucial pending, a vote should clarify. BTW we should try to release more often than once a year as we already discussed, 6 months seems good to me. I must say a lot of changes have occurred this year, and that's great to see :) Jacques

Re: Creating a new release branch in preparation for the new release

Hi Jacopo Yes - it's OK for me. It's been a long time since our last release so it would be good to get something out before the year end if possible. Thanks Sharan On 2016-11-21 08:08 (+0100), Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi all, > > is it ok if I

Re: LoadDefault vs LoadDemo was [Re: Should we do binary releases?]

Jacques, The community has gone through tremendous efforts to make the experience of loading and importing adopter specific data as pleasant as possible. See all the functions in the webtools component under *xmldsdump* (what does that mean?):

LoadDefault vs LoadDemo was [Re: Should we do binary releases?]

[PS to ALL: please forget the previous same message in the old thread when answering. I again forgot to create a new thread with a new brand message and not a copy from the old thread. Also when answering you can remove "was [Re: Should we do binary releases?]" in the subject, thanks!] Hi

LoadDefault vs LoadDemo was [Re: Should we do binary releases?]

Hi Pierre, You did not get a clear answer about LoadDefault here. Actually I think you got at least one from Taher elsewhere but I miss it. Anyway, I answer only to this part ("LoadDefault vs LoadDemo") inline below. Le 26/08/2016 à 18:27, Pierre Smits a écrit : [snip] Why should we consider

Re: svn commit: r1770539 - /ofbiz/trunk/build.gradle

Hi Valery, Thank you for your feedback which is highly appreciated. I have to say that I'm quite happy to get feedback on the plugin system which is exactly what we need to continue to improve it. So if I may ask, my understanding is that you want to use this library only during development

Re: svn commit: r1770539 - /ofbiz/trunk/build.gradle

Hi Valery, We don't need to have compileOnly in the main build.gradle file if it's only used in "add-on modules" (we call them plugins). You can use the local build.gradle (in the plugin, aka component) for that. I'm not quite sure yet but it seems we have no need of compileOnly OOTB (yet).