Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Hello, I implemented a first solution on the issue OFBIZ-9558 [1]. If you have a reviewer heart, It would be great :) Nicolas [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9558 Le 07/08/2017 à 09:24, Nicolas Malin a écrit : Thanks Scott, your suggestions complete like a charm this theme

buildbot success in on ofbiz-branch14

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-branch14 while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch14/builds/381 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: forced: by IRC user

buildbot success in on ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins/builds/311 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: silvanus_ubuntu Build

buildbot failure in on ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-trunk-framework-plugins/builds/310 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: orcus_ubuntu Build

buildbot failure in on ofbiz-branch14

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder ofbiz-branch14 while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/ofbiz-branch14/builds/380 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: lares_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler

Alternative UI using Vaadin as ofbiz user interface

Interest for co-operation? We are looking here using vaadin (http://vaadin.com/) as user interface for OFBIz using existing OFBiz screens and forms we have a proof of concept working here and are preparing a vadinDemo component for others to try. We implemented it creating an FTL

Re: Request for enhance entity:SystemProperty.

Hi Wai, Can you give us some examples on the reason to set a specific access to a property or have a UserProperty. Because my first react would be says when you use a property, it's always through a service or screen so the limit access is manage by them. And for the user property it seems

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Thanks Scott, your suggestions complete like a charm this theme :) I will implement the deprecated service process and complete the documentation for the future Nicolas Le 07/08/2017 à 09:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Nice suggestions Thanks Scott Jacques Le 07/08/2017 à 00:02, Scott

Re: Rule to deprecated a service

Nice suggestions Thanks Scott Jacques Le 07/08/2017 à 00:02, Scott Gray a écrit : +1 for logging a warning instead of an error +1 for using an element to deprecate. Although I'd prefer "deprecated" for the element name and I'd prefer "use-instead" for the attribute name. Would keep us

Re: Request for enhance entity:SystemProperty.

Hi Wai, This is typically the kind of questions which can go in dev ML, copying there Thanks Jacques Le 07/08/2017 à 04:44, Wai a écrit : I would like to get some comments on a request to enhance the SystemProperty entity. It would be useful to add the following fields: field: access