Yes!
Thank you Arun for bringing/reporting this and summarize. Agree with you on
we may need to update the existing entities/data as per convention.
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://www.hotwaxsystems.com
www.hotwax.co
Thanks Michael and Rishi for your feedback. If we follow the proper
convention with TypeId and entity name then there is no issue. But the case
is that there is some inconsistency in existing entities. We will have to
fix some of the existing entities as per convention.
--
Thanks & Regards
---
A
Hi All
Just a quick note to let you know that Kenneth (thanks yet again!) has created
us a nice customised image for our website 404 error page. How to not find a
website page and it still looks good!
http://ofbiz.apache.org/404.html
Thanks
Sharan
Yes! thanks Rishi
Jacques
Le 12/09/2017 à 10:16, Rishi Solanki a écrit :
+1 Jacques, Scott, we should keep the mentioned services and enable them by
adding the service definition. Similar services already in system for
party, facility, order, with contact mech (postal address/telecom number)
c
Thanks to Pawan Verma for reporting, everyone for the discussion and Scott for
the detailed argumentation which makes totally sense,
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9708 for that, and will
create the definitions
Jacques
Le 11/09/2017 à 23:32, Scott Gray a écrit :
I'm i
+1 Jacques, Scott, we should keep the mentioned services and enable them by
adding the service definition. Similar services already in system for
party, facility, order, with contact mech (postal address/telecom number)
creation. The code is simply created the work effort with postal
address/teleco
Thanks Michael,
I'm also in favor of using id and description fields suggest the entity
name. Existing model is capable to to resolve the reported issue if we
follow the conventions.
Rishi Solanki
Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd.
Direct: +91-9893287847
http://w