Re: svn commit: r1813679 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: ./ framework/common/groovyScripts/ framework/webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/webapp/control/

2018-01-18 Thread Shi Jinghai
Love you. :) -邮件原件- 发件人: Jacques Le Roux [mailto:jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com] 发送时间: 2018年1月18日 21:02 收件人: dev@ofbiz.apache.org 主题: Re: svn commit: r1813679 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: ./ framework/common/groovyScripts/ framework/webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/webapp/contr

Re: svn commit: r1813679 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk: ./ framework/common/groovyScripts/ framework/webapp/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/webapp/control/

2018-01-18 Thread Jacques Le Roux
You are right Jinghai, This got unnoticed because it's only used internally. But the right word is indeed "Authorization" I'll change that. It will have no side effects because this is only used temporarily during the translation to the other server. It would be misleading to keep it as is. B

Re: [Discussion] documentation framework for OFBiz

2018-01-18 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi Taher I've included some comments inline. On 2018-01-17 16:54, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: > So I have thought of a few ways to implement our documentation > structure and I would like to share my ideas with everyone to see what > you prefer to go with. Here goes: > > - First, let's categorize d

Re: [Discussion] documentation framework for OFBiz

2018-01-18 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi Craig Generally I was thinking about how it was going to be laid out. So if you think about one big consolidated OFBiz Guide that contains both technical and user guide info, then what would that look like? How would you structure the one consolidated output? I don't think that it would ne