Visit/Visitor specific client IPs tracking exclusion

2019-04-11 Thread Giulio Speri - MpStyle Srl
Hello devs, I'm writing because I would like to explain a problem my company, MpStyle, faced with an OFBiz installation with two active ecommerce sites, for one of our customers. I am writing this email to the dev mailing list, because I could not find any reference in the mailings to the kind of

Re: Reformat and homogenize displaying number

2019-04-11 Thread Nicolas Malin
Hi Taher, I appreciated your return, in line On 09/04/2019 22:46, Taher Alkhateeb wrote: looks good. I'm not sure what's the difference between accounting and default formats though? And why do we have Integer format? I loaded some example to help mind projection, yes Integer isn't logical,

Re: svn commit: r1856618 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-plugins/trunk/msg91: ./ config/ data/ data/helpdata/ documents/ entitydef/ servicedef/ src/ src/main/ src/main/java/ src/main/java/org/ src/main/java/org/apa

2019-04-11 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Rishi, In understand that this component currently uses "msg91 services to send sms". But could we not have another name, more explicit, for this component, like sms or sendsms for instance? Services tend to disappear or change (Google is the best example). So I'd not associate the name of

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Marital Status not managed properly in Person entity

2019-04-11 Thread Suraj Khurana
Hello, I have created a ticket here . -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana TECHNICAL CONSULTANT mobile: +91 9669750002 email: suraj.khur...@hotwax.co www.hotwax.co On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 6:14 PM Suraj Khurana wrote: > Thanks, everyone for

Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Marital Status not managed properly in Person entity

2019-04-11 Thread Suraj Khurana
Thanks, everyone for your inputs. Nicolas, Yes, we can manage things with PartyClassification to maintain time span of it as well, it brings some complexities to handle now, as a party can be in multiple classifications on the same time, etc etc, maintaining PartyRelationship is a high-level