Re: [jira] [Updated] (OFBIZ-11472) Demo instance setup for OFBiz 17.12 release and obsolete 13.07 demo

HI Swapnil, Your update of OFBIZ-11472 made me wonder about the OFBiz sprints. See [1]. Shoul tickets in the section 'Issues not completed' not be pushed back to the backlog? [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=318=OFBIZ=reporting=sprintRetrospective=601 Pierre

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

It happened to me a few times that a PR didn't pass the quality gates of SonarCloud. And it helped me to correct the situation on a next push RE: BTW is a PR pushable if the SonarCloud tests don't pass? SonarCloud tests are done AFTER the PR is created. Then it checks on every commit coming in

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

For me both are useless, I have never seen a SonarCloud Quality Gate not passing and this information is visible on the PR before pushing it BTW is a PR pushable if the SonarCloud tests don't  pass? I could filter them, but by experience I tend to privilege cutting at root. Because maintainer

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

Hi Pierre, For me, this one is good --> Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! This one seems to be useless --> sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request -- Thanks & Regards Pawan Verma Technical Consultant *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* http://www.hotwaxsystems.com

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

Just curious, but what do we want to get into the ml from github? If infra needs to be involved for modifications, then we better have lost of action items ready. Mvg Pierre Op wo 20 mei 2020 19:13 schreef Pawan Verma : > Hey Jacques, Pierre > > Yes, I also feel it's useless and annoying. IMO

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

Hey Jacques, Pierre Yes, I also feel it's useless and annoying. IMO If we can mute this notification, it would be a great thing. -- Thanks & Regards Pawan Verma Technical Consultant *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 9:39 PM

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

Not an issue. At least here, as I filter those out in my mail client. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory

Re: [GitHub] [ofbiz-framework] sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: Improved: Update Data Sets

Hi All, Do we have to suffer the comment then removed all time? It uselessly clutters the email boxes, isn't? Thanks Jacques Le 20/05/2020 à 14:31, GitBox a écrit : sonarcloud[bot] removed a comment on pull request #117: URL:

Re: New Online Help, base on ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/ofbizdoc

Thanks Olivier, I must add that it's the current location and it would need more work to change it, notably Infra help Jacques Le 20/05/2020 à 16:24, Olivier Heintz a écrit : Yes, of course My explanation was not clear, I propose to have one documentation by release and use it in the

Re: Modify OFBiz commit message template

+1 to [Implemented | Improved | Fixed | Completed| Documented | Reverted]: [Jira title | Free text] [(OFBIZ-)] [More detailed explanation of what has been done and what the fix achieves, sideeffects etc.] [Thanks:] [ for ... and for] Regards, James On 2020/05/20

Re: New Online Help, base on ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/ofbizdoc

Yes, of course My explanation was not clear, I propose to have one documentation by release and use it in the relative help My question is more about using (or not) ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/${release}/ofbizdoc Le 20/05/2020 à 08:32, Michael Brohl a écrit : > Hi Olivier, > > wouldn't

Re: OFBiz Monthly Blog

Great idea, Pranay, Such communications are an important aide to help grow the interest in or product and our project, hopefully leading to more contributors. Where is the link to the preview? So that I can see what the style and format is for submissions. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits

Re: OFBiz Monthly Blog

Hi everyone, I have created the blog entries for Jan-April 2020 and added the dev details. Thanks Ulrich Heidfeld for putting them together! Someone willing to add the introduction/news text? Thanks, Michael Brohl ecomify GmbH - www.ecomify.de Am 07.05.20 um 22:00 schrieb Michael Brohl:

Re: Modify OFBiz commit message template

Hello everyone, Am 20.05.20 um 11:36 schrieb Pierre Smits: The subject can be quite lengthy (as I have experienced a few times when doing PRs). I suggest to moving the ticket Id to the front of the first line. Also, whatever the categorisation is ([Implemented | Improved | Fixed | Completed|

Re: Modify OFBiz commit message template

Can GitHub be configured that when a ticket Id is present it is shown as a link to the ticket in Jira. IIRC I have seen it happening. Met vriendelijke groet, Pierre Smits *Proud* *contributor** of* Apache OFBiz since 2008 (without privileges) *Apache Trafodion

Re: Modify OFBiz commit message template

The subject can be quite lengthy (as I have experienced a few times when doing PRs). I suggest to moving the ticket Id to the front of the first line. Also, whatever the categorisation is ([Implemented | Improved | Fixed | Completed| Documented | Reverted]: this should be referenced (at least) in

Modify OFBiz commit message template

Hi, With Git IMO it's convenient (more information) to have the Jira number in the title, eg: https://markmail.org/message/cyslglyoh5gf7l7t If nobody disagree I'd like to modify https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/OFBiz+commit+message+template We could have [Implemented

Re: enter a date directly, no more possible

Thanks, Olivier for the report. This bug was introduced by me under OFBIZ-10432 and I've fixed it at bc0afa3. Thanks! -- Thanks & Regards Pawan Verma Technical Consultant *HotWax Systems* *Enterprise open source experts* http://www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 1:50 PM Olivier

enter a date directly, no more possible

Hi, This morning on demo-trunk, it seems, it's no more possible to enter a date-time in a date-time field without using the calendar icon ! ex: on party, added a security group The field seems to be disable is it normal ? it's not really convenient Olivier

Re: New Online Help, base on ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/site/ofbizdoc

Hi Olivier, wouldn't it be better to have different documentation paths for the different branches? If we would show the trunk documentation/help for stable branches, it will most likely be wrong in some cases. Another thought: it would be great if we could have the docs available at