+1 from my side.
Best regards,
Michael
Am 03.05.23 um 09:45 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato:
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote:
[...]
I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carry out
this work twice. What if we abandon the 22.01 release and instead
+1
A much better explanation of my thoughts than I could have put into words.
Thanks,
Michael
Am 02.05.23 um 11:43 schrieb Daniel Watford:
Hi Nicholas,
I can see value in the approach I think you are proposing (please correct
me if I am wrong) which I would summarise as:
- All scripts are
Le 03/05/2023 à 09:45, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote:
[...]
I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carry out
this work twice. What if we abandon the 22.01 release and instead make a
new release branch (23.xx) soon
On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:17 AM Daniel Watford wrote:
[...]
> I'll ask one more question (and then run for cover!): Rather than carry out
> this work twice. What if we abandon the 22.01 release and instead make a
> new release branch (23.xx) soon after moving the Groovy sources?
>
Yes, we could
