Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-10 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
+1 to remove the functionality because it is a very old contribution that has been left incomplete for several years without much interest from community members. Jacopo On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 12:45 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to drag your attention to the Jira issue Dennis

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-10 Thread Deepak Dixit
+1 we can remove CompDoc functionality from the code base Thanks & Regards -- Deepak Dixit On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:55 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Based on https://markmail.org/message/4e4baunevgksv3bo I'd say that if > nobody wants to work on it it's

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-10 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Based on https://markmail.org/message/4e4baunevgksv3bo I'd say that if nobody wants to work on it it's better to get rid of it BTW IIRW the purpose of *CompDoc* was to create specific composite documents based on "primitive" content types. Jacques Le 08/12/2018 à 20:09, Taher Alkhateeb a

Re: [DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-08 Thread Taher Alkhateeb
My recommendation is to remove the functionality. It seems immature and incomplete, and hence probably not used. On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 2:45 PM Michael Brohl wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to drag your attention to the Jira issue Dennis created a few > months ago [1]. The CompDoc functionality

[DISCUSSION] Fix or remove CompDoc funtionality of the content manager

2018-12-08 Thread Michael Brohl
Hi all, I'd like to drag your attention to the Jira issue Dennis created a few months ago [1]. The CompDoc functionality of the content manager has several bugs and does not seem to work properly. We should discuss if we either a. fix these bugs and make the funtionality work properly? or