[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12614437#action_12614437
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-1879:
Bruno,
A quick way too convince us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613977#action_12613977
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-1879:
Bruno,
Please take some time to read the UI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613991#action_12613991
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1879:
OK Adrian,
no problem, it was only a trivial
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613761#action_12613761
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-1879:
Bruno,
We are trying to move away from the
Adrian,
sorry but I thought we were moving TOward the use of the screenlet widget,
weren't we?
I often see commits with the container to screenlet conversion log
message.
Where we stated against this?
Thank you,
-Bruno
2008/7/16 Adrian Crum (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[
Converting individual screen widget elements to the screenlet widget
element is fine. That is a widget XML issue. In other words, it's an
effort to reduce XML code.
What I was referring to is different. I was referring to *layout* and
how screenlets are added to screens when they aren't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12613845#action_12613845
]
Bruno Busco commented on OFBIZ-1879:
Adrian,
as explained in the dev ML
