Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Thanks for the bug report Adam, and thanks for the quick fix Adrian.
>> By the way, I don't see the need of doing all this noise around an
>> error... it happens to all of us, me and you included Adam.
>>
>> Jacopo
>
> So t
From: "Jacopo Cappellato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks for the bug report Adam, and thanks for the quick fix Adrian.
By the way, I don't see the need of doing all this noise around an
error... it happens to all of us, me and you included Adam.
Jacopo
So true !
Jacques
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5
Thanks for the bug report Adam, and thanks for the quick fix Adrian.
By the way, I don't see the need of doing all this noise around an
error... it happens to all of us, me and you included Adam.
Jacopo
On Sep 6, 2008, at 5:05 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Thanks Adam.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
Thanks Adam.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Sep 5, 2008, at 5:12 PM, Adam Heath wrote:
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Thanks for fixing it Adrian. Vikas, please be more careful on this
next
time.
Yeah, just did another seed data f
Tim Ruppert wrote:
> Thanks for fixing it Adrian. Vikas, please be more careful on this next
> time.
Yeah, just did another seed data fix. Revision 692448 didn't even pass
an ant clean-data/run-install run. Which is extremely simple to do.
Thanks for fixing it Adrian. Vikas, please be more careful on this
next time.
Cheers,
Tim
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Sep 5, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
How long would you have waited to fix it?
I've been in WebTools all
Adrian Crum wrote:
> How long would you have waited to fix it?
Probably an hour; almost end of day here.
And I have something big planned for GroovyUtil.
How long would you have waited to fix it?
I've been in WebTools all day.
-Adrian
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Done, rev 692569.
I could have done that myself; that wasn't the reason I sent it.
I'm surprised no one else noticed this particular problem; the entire
ordermgr was broken
Adrian Crum wrote:
> Done, rev 692569.
I could have done that myself; that wasn't the reason I sent it.
I'm surprised no one else noticed this particular problem; the entire
ordermgr was broken all day because of it.
Done, rev 692569.
-Adrian
Adam Heath wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/servicedef/services.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/servicedef/services.xml?rev=692448&r1=692447&r2=692448&view=diff
=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Modified: ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/servicedef/services.xml
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ofbiz/trunk/applications/order/servicedef/services.xml?rev=692448&r1=692447&r2=692448&view=diff
> ==
11 matches
Mail list logo