+1
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Ashish Vijaywargiya <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
> Specialpurpose component will always be treated as the DERIVED one.
> So no way for applications component to be dependent on the specialpurpose
> components.
>
> --
> Ashish
>
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:1
+1.
Specialpurpose component will always be treated as the DERIVED one.
So no way for applications component to be dependent on the specialpurpose
components.
--
Ashish
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Jacques Le Roux <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>
Hi Adrian,
i agree that should not happeni also cannot remember i added it
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 10:38 -0700, Adrian Crum wrote:
> I just noticed that the Party Manager component depends upon the Project
> Manager component - because it uses Project Manager UI labels.
>
> Do we want an appl
From: "David E Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 7, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I just noticed that the Party Manager component depends upon the
Project Manager component - because it uses Project Manager UI labels.
Do we want an application component to be dependent on a
speci
On Jul 7, 2008, at 11:38 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I just noticed that the Party Manager component depends upon the
Project Manager component - because it uses Project Manager UI labels.
Do we want an application component to be dependent on a
specialpurpose component?
No, definitely not.
I just noticed that the Party Manager component depends upon the Project
Manager component - because it uses Project Manager UI labels.
Do we want an application component to be dependent on a specialpurpose
component?
-Adrian
