Hi Hans:
Yes, this is used in other places.
What exactly do you mean by "change"?
Regards,
Ruth
Hans Bakker wrote:
If we change that and can still select a "primary email" then that
sounds pretty good...however isn't this often used in the system?
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:23 -0600, Adam Heath w
If we change that and can still select a "primary email" then that
sounds pretty good...however isn't this often used in the system?
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 15:23 -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> There is currently a PRIMARY_EMAIL, PRIMARY_LOCATION, BILLING_EMAIL,
> BILLING_LOCATION, etc. Why can't that
Cimballi a écrit :
Not sure about the original idea, but from my point of view this helps
to know what kind of contact mech is behind the purpose type.
For example, if you have a party and you want to get its primary email
contact mech, you search for PRIMARY_EMAIL and you know you will have
only
Cimballi wrote:
> Not sure about the original idea, but from my point of view this helps
> to know what kind of contact mech is behind the purpose type.
> For example, if you have a party and you want to get its primary email
> contact mech, you search for PRIMARY_EMAIL and you know you will have
>
Not sure about the original idea, but from my point of view this helps
to know what kind of contact mech is behind the purpose type.
For example, if you have a party and you want to get its primary email
contact mech, you search for PRIMARY_EMAIL and you know you will have
only emails (well, if you
There is currently a PRIMARY_EMAIL, PRIMARY_LOCATION, BILLING_EMAIL,
BILLING_LOCATION, etc. Why can't that just be PRIMARY, BILLING, etc?
