Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Thu, 1/28/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: FlexibleStringExpander refactor
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 4:39 PM
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum
When I refactored FlexibleStringExpander.java a while ago (rev 687442),
there were things I wanted to improve but couldn't - because I wanted to
maintain backward-compatibility.
Adam's recent memory-saving efforts reminded me of one of the things I
wanted to change in
Adrian Crum wrote:
When I refactored FlexibleStringExpander.java a while ago (rev 687442),
there were things I wanted to improve but couldn't - because I wanted to
maintain backward-compatibility.
Adam's recent memory-saving efforts reminded me of one of the things I
wanted to change in
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
When I refactored FlexibleStringExpander.java a while ago (rev 687442),
there were things I wanted to improve but couldn't - because I wanted to
maintain backward-compatibility.
Adam's recent memory-saving efforts reminded me of one of the things I
wanted
Adrian Crum wrote:
That's it. If you want to know how this will benefit memory use, read on...
Consider this mini-language statement:
set field=isTrue value=Y/
The value attribute is kept in memory as a FlexibleStringExpander
instance. That instance will contain one instance of
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
When I refactored FlexibleStringExpander.java a while ago (rev 687442),
there were things I wanted to improve but couldn't - because I wanted to
maintain backward-compatibility.
Adam's recent memory-saving efforts reminded me of one of
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
That's it. If you want to know how this will benefit memory use, read on...
Consider this mini-language statement:
set field=isTrue value=Y/
The value attribute is kept in memory as a FlexibleStringExpander
instance. That instance will contain one
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
When I refactored FlexibleStringExpander.java a while ago (rev
687442),
there were things I wanted to improve but couldn't - because I
wanted to
maintain backward-compatibility.
Adam's recent
--- On Thu, 1/28/10, Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com wrote:
From: Adam Heath doo...@brainfood.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: FlexibleStringExpander refactor
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 4:39 PM
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam Heath wrote:
Adrian Crum wrote:
Adam
