know if that fixes the problem.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types: found an error?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 5, 2010, 7:31 AM
Thanks Hans. I
Cool - I will have a better fix committed to the trunk soon.
-Adrian
--- On Tue, 7/6/10, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote:
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types: found an error?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, July 6
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, June 26, 2010, 12:19 PM
Looks like a good idea to me. I
suppose you would keep backward compatibility?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
The blob field type is being used
--- On Sat, 6/26/10, Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com wrote:
From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, June 26, 2010, 12:19 PM
Looks like a good idea to me. I
suppose you would
Thanks Hans. I will look into it.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote:
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types: found an error?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 5, 2010, 3:31 AM
: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types: found an error?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 5, 2010, 7:31 AM
Thanks Hans. I will look into it.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
wrote:
From: Hans Bakker
Types: found an error?
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Monday, July 5, 2010, 7:31 AM
Thanks Hans. I will look into it.
-Adrian
--- On Mon, 7/5/10, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
wrote:
From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types
Subject: Re: Discussion: New Field Types
To: dev@ofbiz.apache.org
Date: Saturday, June 26, 2010, 12:19 PM
Looks like a good idea to me. I
suppose you would keep backward compatibility?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
The blob field type is being used as a catch-all
The blob field type is being used as a catch-all for multiple binary types.
Right now getting an object from a blob field type could return a byte array, a
deserialized Java object, or a javax.sql.rowset.serial.SerialBlob object. There
is no way to know for sure what will be returned - the
Looks like a good idea to me. I suppose you would keep backward compatibility?
Jacques
From: Adrian Crum adrian.c...@yahoo.com
The blob field type is being used as a catch-all for multiple binary types.
Right now getting an object from a blob field type
could return a byte array, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
