SV: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-26 Thread Torstein Hegbom
: iCalendar Integration The improved iCalendar integration has been committed, and there is a Wiki page: http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/piE. I still haven't resolved the party assignment role issue, but it will be an easy change to make once a decision is made. -Adrian Adrian Crum wrote: I'm almost ready

Re: SV: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-26 Thread Adrian Crum
@ofbiz.apache.org Emne: Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration The improved iCalendar integration has been committed, and there is a Wiki page: http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/piE. I still haven't resolved the party assignment role issue, but it will be an easy change to make once a decision is made. -Adrian

Re: SV: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-26 Thread Hans Bakker
Please have a look at the project manager, it is all there.even the invoicing of these entered hours On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 19:48 +0200, Torstein Hegbom wrote: . How about Timesheet-management (those persons that forgot to fill it in, and those that has filled in too many hours by

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com I'm almost ready to commit the work I have been doing on the iCalendar integration. Before I do, I would like some feedback on a particular function. Background: One work effort serves as an iCalendar publish point - it's not a work effort that anyone

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-24 Thread Adrian Crum
Thanks Jacques! Attendee is already defined in the RFC, so I was trying not to use it - since that might cause confusion. -Adrian Jacques Le Roux wrote: From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com I'm almost ready to commit the work I have been doing on the iCalendar integration. Before I do, I

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Yes I see it's used in OFBiz, but which RFC are you speaking about ? I thought you were speaking about http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/qA8 attachment but obvisouly it's not there. Thanks Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com Thanks Jacques! Attendee is already defined in the RFC, so I was

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-24 Thread Adrian Crum
http://www.apps.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2445.html Jacques Le Roux wrote: Yes I see it's used in OFBiz, but which RFC are you speaking about ? I thought you were speaking about http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/qA8 attachment but obvisouly it's not there. Thanks Jacques From: Adrian Crum adri...@hlmksw.com

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-24 Thread Adrian Crum
The improved iCalendar integration has been committed, and there is a Wiki page: http://docs.ofbiz.org/x/piE. I still haven't resolved the party assignment role issue, but it will be an easy change to make once a decision is made. -Adrian Adrian Crum wrote: I'm almost ready to commit the

Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-23 Thread Adrian Crum
I'm almost ready to commit the work I have been doing on the iCalendar integration. Before I do, I would like some feedback on a particular function. Background: One work effort serves as an iCalendar publish point - it's not a work effort that anyone interacts with, it just contains

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-23 Thread Hans Bakker
Hi Adrian, thanks first of all the work you are doing here, and excellent addition to the system. However i have the impression that not enough existing functions in ofbiz are re-used and the implementation is not integrated enough. Related to that is how this will work together with the calendar

Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration

2009-06-23 Thread Adrian Crum
to the publish point as a delegate. I could go on. The system was designed to be flexible and meet most calendaring needs. -Adrian --- On Tue, 6/23/09, Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com wrote: From: Hans Bakker mailingl...@antwebsystems.com Subject: Re: Discussion: iCalendar Integration