Re: Gump

2009-12-16 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
>> >> 2009/12/16 Jacques Le Roux >> >> Last revision looks ok >>> http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk >>> >>> Jacques >>> >>> From: "Adrian Cumiskey" >>> >>> Hi all, >>

Re: Gump

2009-12-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
aterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk Jacques From: "Adrian Cumiskey" Hi all, I discovered some compilation problems with trunk (r891164) this morning. I was wondering if there are any plans in the future to use the Gump continuous integration and build for the OFBiz project? Thanks, Adrian Cumiskey.

Re: Gump

2009-12-16 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
orning. >> I >> was wondering if there are any plans in the future to use the Gump >> continuous integration and build for the OFBiz project? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Adrian Cumiskey. >> >> >

Re: Gump

2009-12-16 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Last revision looks ok http://ci.apache.org/waterfall?show=ofbiz-trunk Jacques From: "Adrian Cumiskey" Hi all, I discovered some compilation problems with trunk (r891164) this morning. I was wondering if there are any plans in the future to use the Gump continuous integration and

Gump

2009-12-16 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi all, I discovered some compilation problems with trunk (r891164) this morning. I was wondering if there are any plans in the future to use the Gump continuous integration and build for the OFBiz project? Thanks, Adrian Cumiskey.