Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Thanks Vikas, Commited in r712366, Wiki page updated Jacques From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Jacques, I have added the details at the bottom of the page http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Upgrading+OFBiz+from+earlier+revisions After commit, this will need a little modification. It

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Thanks Jacques. Vikas On Nov 8, 2008, at 2:31 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Thanks Vikas, Commited in r712366, Wiki page updated Jacques From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Jacques, I have added the details at the bottom of the page

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Hi Jacques, I have added the details at the bottom of the page http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Upgrading+OFBiz+from+earlier+revisions After commit, this will need a little modification. It is to replace ?? with actual revision number. The Jira issue is

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Hi Vikas, I'd prefer to wait, before committing, that the changes are documented Thanks Jacques From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think it would be good to document such change. - Vikas On Oct 13, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Vikas, Did not look into detail yet, but

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Thanks Jacques for interest. Please find the patch at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-1996 , as it has framework files and I do not have rights. - Vikas On Oct 12, 2008, at 9:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: +1 (64 occurences in code, ie *.bsh, *.ftl, *.gro*, *.java, *.xml)

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

Hi Vikas, Did not look into detail yet, but did you think about any needs to fill http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Upgrading+OFBiz+from+earlier+revisions ? Jacques From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks Jacques for interest. Please find the patch at

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

I think it would be good to document such change. - Vikas On Oct 13, 2008, at 8:36 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Hi Vikas, Did not look into detail yet, but did you think about any needs to fill http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBTECH/Upgrading+OFBiz+from+earlier+revisions ? Jacques From:

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

+1 (64 occurences in code, ie *.bsh, *.ftl, *.gro*, *.java, *.xml) Jacques From: Vikas Mayur [EMAIL PROTECTED] dev, WDYT ? If agreed I would submit a patch. - Vikas

I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

dev, WDYT ? If agreed I would submit a patch. - Vikas

Re: I think userPrefGroupId field on UserPrefGroupType should be userPrefGroupTypeId, as per conventions

or entity name would be UserPrefGroup and not UserPrefGroupType as we are actually creating a group of User Preferences (This is what I understand with the cursory view of data, but I may be wrong). - Vikas On Oct 7, 2008, at 11:55 AM, Vikas Mayur wrote: dev, WDYT ? If agreed I would