ing a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
>
hael!
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
>
was
only put in trunk. Actually I believe we should not put either, sorry for the
mess, I slowly get used to it :D
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
>
12.04)
(was: Trunk)
13.07.04
15.12.01
Note: we no longer officially support the R12.04 branch
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelations
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
>
had not the time to check/fix this. I hope to
have it fixed in the next days.
Have a nice weekend,
Michael
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
>
662?jql=project%20%3D%20OFBIZ%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%22Release%20Branch%2014.12%22%20ORDER%20BY%20updated%20DESC]
Thanks!
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
Release Branch 14.12
Trunk
Thanks Forrest,
your patch is in
trunk r1706694
release branch 14.12 r1706696
release branch 13.07 r1706697
release branch 12.04 r1706698
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelations
o me
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
>
g a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Compon
> PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
>
g a PartyRelationship
> ---
>
> Key: OFBIZ-6662
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
> Project: OFBiz
> Issue Type: Bug
> Compon
Forrest Rae created OFBIZ-6662:
--
Summary: PartyRelationship.securityGroupId not added when adding a
PartyRelationship
Key: OFBIZ-6662
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-6662
Project: OFBiz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jacopo Cappellato closed OFBIZ-3851.
Resolution: Incomplete
> this is the main Jira for emplementing the partyRelationship
partyRelationshipTypeId" value="EMPLOYMENT" to CreateEmployee
> this is the main Jira for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in
> Data model book
> --
>
>
sn't been a problem in
the past except for cases where the definition was not looked into. Even
in the accounting extensions you setup the internal organization rollup
demo data just fine...
-David
BJ Freeman sent the following on 9/2/2011 6:48 PM:
> https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org:8443/w
https://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org:8443/webtools/control/FindGeneric?entityName=PartyRelationship&find=true&VIEW_SIZE=50&VIEW_INDEX=0
some rows have partyIdFrom= Company
others have partyIdTo =Company
The Pattern in the data Model book is the subset is from and next layer
up is
in looking at the Artifact for PartyRelationship, I see a some
Controller Views not in Partymgr. Could those all use the same
screen/form in the partymgr?
Scott mentiioned about breaking down the Controller.xml so I would like
to seperate the PartyRelationship into controller-PartyRelationship.xml
FBIZ/Implementation+of+PartyRelationship
> this is the main Jira for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in
> Data model book
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3851
>
for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in
> Data model book
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851
>
ira for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in
> Data model book
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851
>
for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in
> Data model book
> --
>
> Key: OFBIZ-3851
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851
>
this is the main Jira for emplementing the partyRelationship as defined in Data
model book
--
Key: OFBIZ-3851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3851
Yes, I think this is correct. The best way to make sure is to look at
the demo data, like the DemoOrderPeopleData.xml file and a few others
have PartyRelationship data in them.
-David
On May 1, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
The PartyRelationship entity always confuses me, and
Yeah, cool. My main concern was to make sure I (and anyone else for
that matter) understands the definition of the TOs vs FROMs. :)
On May 1, 2009, at 4:44 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
--- On Fri, 5/1/09, Andrew Zeneski
wrote:
we could also say:
"100" in the role of "EMPLOYEE" is a
"GROUP_RO
--- On Fri, 5/1/09, Andrew Zeneski wrote:
> we could also say:
>
> "100" in the role of "EMPLOYEE" is a
> "GROUP_ROLLUP" of "Company" in the role
> of "ORGANIZATION_ROLE"
or
"100 in the role of "SALES_REP" is a "EMPLOYEE" of "Company" in the role of
"EMPLOYER"
More than likely the employee
The PartyRelationship entity always confuses me, and some of the demo
data makes it even more confusing. I see it going many ways. My
understanding of it is:
"partyIdTo" in the role of "roleTypeIdTo" is a
"partyRelationshipTypeId" of "partyIdFrom" in
Hi Patrick,
Could you please submit a patch in Jira following
http://docs.ofbiz.org/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Contributors+Best+Practices
Thanks
Jacques
From: "Patrick Antivackis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello,
I added a function to automatically create (if not exist) a relationship of
type contact
Hello,
I added a function to automatically create (if not exist) a relationship of
type contact when a person create an account on a ecommerce website, and of
type customer when he makes it first order.
Are you interested by the patch. Should I let it automatic, or should i add
a parameter in the
29 matches
Mail list logo
