Re: Proposal: Improved Web Application Authorization

2013-12-01 Thread Adrian Crum
Done in revision 1546891. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On 10/14/2013 7:16 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: Currently, the web application authorization is a jumbled up mess. I would like to make things much simpler. The areas of improvement are described below... 1.

Re: Proposal: Improved Web Application Authorization

2013-10-15 Thread Jacques Le Roux
I did not look into all the details but this proposition sounds good to me. I always wondered about OFBTOOLS and was not even aware about NONE. I don't mind removing NONE (since it was undocumented) but it would be good to have now a documentation about base-permission empty allows all accesses.

Re: Proposal: Improved Web Application Authorization

2013-10-15 Thread Adrian Crum
My plan is to deprecate the base-permission attribute and leave it functioning as-is. The new attribute would be used in the trunk and in any new web applications. As usual, I will try to document everything as best I can. Adrian Crum Sandglass Software www.sandglass-software.com On

Proposal: Improved Web Application Authorization

2013-10-14 Thread Adrian Crum
Currently, the web application authorization is a jumbled up mess. I would like to make things much simpler. The areas of improvement are described below... 1. Configuring web application authorization is confusing: webapp name=party title=Party ...

Re: Proposal: Improved Web Application Authorization

2013-10-14 Thread Ashish Vijaywargiya
Hello Adrian, Your proposal looks good to me and yes it will make things much simpler. +1 -- Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Media - est. 1997 ApacheCon US 2013 Gold Sponsor http://na.apachecon.com/sponsors/ On Tuesday 15 October 2013 04:46 AM, Adrian Crum wrote: Currently, the web