David,
Thank you very much for your comments. I agree with the idea of data model extensions designed
around a particular configuration option.
I was thinking more along the lines of having some of the system-level configuration options stored
in an entity - so we could have a basic system
On Dec 11, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of having some of the system-
level configuration options stored in an entity - so we could have a
basic system configuration UI. Of course some things could be left
out - like the cache settings you
This is an interesting approach, but very different from what I had
imagined and what has been discussed (though not in a lot of detail).
Rather than creating a generic structure I'd rather continue with the
existing pattern of designing data model extensions according to the
nature of
Now that OFBiz supports XML properties files, I've started thinking about David's comment that
configuration settings and such should be kept in the database - and how to add that capability to
the UtilProperties class bag of tricks.
Just like the XML properties file idea, I'd like to make it
